[PATCH] powerpc: Use octal numbers for file permissions

Oliver O'Halloran oohall at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 21:54:29 AEDT 2017


It has been pointed out that this actually occured in 2017. My apologies.

On 17/01/2017 9:50 PM, "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall at gmail.com> wrote:

> "It's possible I missed one, but I did genuinely review all of it"
>
> Cyril Bur, 2016
> In a hobart pub, specifically The Winston
>
> On 17/01/2017 8:53 PM, "Michael Ellerman" <mpe at ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
>> Cyril Bur <cyrilbur at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 14:54 +1100, Russell Currey wrote:
>> >> Symbolic macros are unintuitive and hard to read, whereas octal
>> constants
>> >> are much easier to interpret.  Replace macros for the basic permission
>> >> flags (user/group/other read/write/execute) with numeric constants
>> >> instead, across the whole powerpc tree.
>> >>
>> >> Introducing a significant number of changes across the tree for no
>> runtime
>> >> benefit isn't exactly desirable, but so long as these macros are still
>> >> used in the tree people will keep sending patches that add them.  Not
>> only
>> >> are they hard to parse at a glance, there are multiple ways of coming
>> to
>> >> the same value (as you can see with 0444 and 0644 in this patch) which
>> >> hurts readability.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur at gmail.com>
>>
>> Did you really really review every single change?
>>
>> Because if you did then I don't have to, and that would be *great* :)
>>
>> cheers
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20170117/5d8ad2d6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list