[PATCH v5 2/5] powernv:stop: Uniformly rename power9 to arch300

Oliver O'Halloran oohall at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 14:46:07 AEDT 2017


On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Gautham R Shenoy
<ego at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:17:33PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
>> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >
>> > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some
>> > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others
>> > had arch300.
>> >
>>
>> I would prefer power9 to arch300
>>
>
>
> I don't have a strong preference for arch300 vs power9, will change it
> to power9 if that looks better.

Personally I think we should be as descriptive as possible and use
power_9_arch_300_the_bikeshed_is_red_dammit.

Oliver


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list