[PATCH] powerpc/mm/hugetlb: Filter out hugepage size not supported by page table layout
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Feb 20 14:32:03 AEDT 2017
On Monday 20 February 2017 02:35 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 15:48 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>> + /*
>> + * We need to make sure that for different page sizes reported by
>> + * firmware we only add hugetlb support for page sizes that can be
>> + * supported by linux page table layout.
>> + * For now we have
>> + * Radix: 2M
>> + * Hash: 16M and 16G
>> + */
>> + if (radix_enabled()) {
>> + if (mmu_psize != MMU_PAGE_2M)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else {
>> + if (mmu_psize != MMU_PAGE_16M && mmu_psize != MMU_PAGE_16G)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
> Hash could support others...
On book3s 64 ? I had the above within #ifdef.
> Same with radix and PUD level pages.
Yes, but gigantic hugepage is not yet supported. Once we add that we will
add MMU_PAGE_1G here.
>
> Why do we need that ? Won't FW provide separate properties for hash and
> radix page sizes anyway ?
>
To avoid crashes like the one reported in the commit message due to
buggy firmware ? Also
It can serve as an easy way to understand what hugepage sizes are
supported by different platforms.
I am yet to figure out what the FSL_BOOK3E and PPC_8xx #ifdef above that
hunk is all about. Having
the supported hugepage size clearly verified against makes it easy ?
-aneesh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list