[PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mm/radix: Update pte update sequence for pte clear case
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Feb 9 13:58:19 AEDT 2017
In the kernel we do follow the below sequence in different code paths.
pte = ptep_get_clear(ptep)
....
set_pte_at(ptep, pte)
We do that for mremap, autonuma protection update and softdirty clearing. This
implies our optimization to skip a tlb flush when clearing a pte update is
not valid, because for DD1 system that followup set_pte_at will be done witout
doing the required tlbflush. Fix that by always doing the dd1 style pte update
irrespective of new_pte value. In a later patch we will optimize the application
exit case.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
index b4d1302387a3..70a3cdcdbe47 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/radix.h
@@ -144,16 +144,10 @@ static inline unsigned long radix__pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm,
* new value of pte
*/
new_pte = (old_pte | set) & ~clr;
- /*
- * If we are trying to clear the pte, we can skip
- * the below sequence and batch the tlb flush. The
- * tlb flush batching is done by mmu gather code
- */
- if (new_pte) {
- asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
- radix__flush_tlb_pte_p9_dd1(old_pte, mm, addr);
+ asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
+ radix__flush_tlb_pte_p9_dd1(old_pte, mm, addr);
+ if (new_pte)
__radix_pte_update(ptep, 0, new_pte);
- }
} else
old_pte = __radix_pte_update(ptep, clr, set);
asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
--
2.7.4
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list