[RFC] implement QUEUED spinlocks on powerpc
Eric Dumazet
edumazet at google.com
Tue Feb 7 17:46:10 AEDT 2017
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:21 PM, panxinhui <xinhui at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> hi all
> I do some netperf tests and get some benchmark results.
> I also attach my test script and netperf-result(Excel)
>
> There are two machine. one runs netserver and the other runs netperf
> benchmark. 1000Mbps network is connected with them.
>
> #ip link infomation
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
> UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> link/ether ba:68:9c:14:32:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> According to the results, there is not much performance gap with each other.
> And as we are only testing the throughput, the pvqspinlock shows the
> overhead of its pv stuff. but qspinlock shows a little improvement than
> spinlock. My simple summary in this testcase is
> qspinlock > spinlock > pvqspinlock.
>
> when run 200 concurrent netperf, I paste the total throughput here.
>
> concurrent runners| total throughput | variance
> -------------------------------------------
> spinlock | 199 | 66882.8 | 89.93
> -------------------------------------------
> qspinlock | 199 | 66350.4 | 72.0239
> -------------------------------------------
> pvqspinlock | 199 | 64740.5 | 85.7837
>
> You could see more data in nerperf.xlsx
>
> thanks
> xinhui
Hi xinhui
1Gbit NIC is too slow for this use case. I would try a 10Gbit NIC at least...
Alternatively, you could use loopback interface. (netperf -H 127.0.0.1)
tc qd add dev lo root pfifo limit 10000
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list