[tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add debugging code to catch missing update_rq_clock() calls
Paul E. McKenney
paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Feb 7 02:10:48 AEDT 2017
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:53:10AM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>
> >>> I've seen it on tip. It looks like hot unplug goes really slow when
> >>> there's running tasks on the CPU being taken down.
> >>>
> >>> What I did was something like:
> >>>
> >>> taskset -p $((1<<1)) $$
> >>> for ((i=0; i<20; i++)) do while :; do :; done & done
> >>>
> >>> taskset -p $((1<<0)) $$
> >>> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> >>>
> >>> And with those 20 tasks stuck sucking cycles on CPU1, the unplug goes
> >>> _really_ slow and the RCU stall triggers. What I suspect happens is that
> >>> hotplug stops participating in the RCU state machine early, but only
> >>> tells RCU about it really late, and in between it gets suspicious it
> >>> takes too long.
> >>>
> >>> I've yet to dig through the RCU code to figure out the exact sequence of
> >>> events, but found the above to be fairly reliable in triggering the
> >>> issue.
> >
> >> If you send me the full splat from the dmesg and the RCU portions of
> >> .config, I will take a look. Is this new behavior, or a new test?
> >
>
> I have sent the required files to you via separate email.
>
> > If new behavior, I would be most suspicious of these commits in -rcu which
> > recently entered -tip:
> >
> > 19e4d983cda1 rcu: Place guard on rcu_all_qs() and rcu_note_context_switch() actions
> > 913324b1364f rcu: Eliminate flavor scan in rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle()
> > fcdcfefafa45 rcu: Pull rcu_qs_ctr into rcu_dynticks structure
> > 0919a0b7e7a5 rcu: Pull rcu_sched_qs_mask into rcu_dynticks structure
> > caa7c8e34293 rcu: Make rcu_note_context_switch() do deferred NOCB wakeups
> > 41e4b159d516 rcu: Make rcu_all_qs() do deferred NOCB wakeups
> > b457a3356a68 rcu: Make call_rcu() do deferred NOCB wakeups
> >
> > Does reverting any of these help?
>
> I tried reverting the above commits. That does not help. I can still recreate the issue.
Thank you for testing, Sachin!
Could you please try building and testing with CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y?
You will need to enable CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y to see this Kconfig option.
Thanx, Paul
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list