[PATCH v2] powerpc/64s: ISAv3 initialize MMU registers before setting partition table

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Tue Dec 5 14:04:42 AEDT 2017


Hi Nick,

Sorry I didn't reply sooner.

Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com> writes:

> kexec can leave MMU registers set when booting into a new kernel, PIDR
> in particular. The boot sequence does not zero PIDR, so it only gets
> set when CPUs first switch to a userspace processes (until then it's
> running a kernel thread with effective PID = 0).
>
> This leaves a window where a process table entry and page tables are
> set up due to user processes running on other CPUs, that happen to
> match with a stale PID. The CPU with that PID may cause speculative
> accesses that address quadrant 0, which will result in cached
> translations and PWC for that process, on a CPU which is not in the
> mm_cpumask and so they will not get invalidated properly.
>
> The most common result is the kernel hanging in infinite page fault
> loops soon after kexec (usually in schedule_tail, which is usually the
> first non-speculative quardant 0 access to a new PID) due to a stale
> PWC. However being a stale translation erorr, it could result in
> anything up to security and data corruption errors.
>
> Fix this by zeroing out PIDR before setting PTCR.
>
> LPIDR is also not initialized, and may cause a similar issue with
> speculative access to quadrant 1/2. This has not been observed, but
> LPIDR is cleared to prevent that possibility.

Isn't LPID initialised in __setup_cpu_power9() and __restore_cpu_power9() ?

eg:

_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
	mflr	r11
	bl	__init_FSCR
	bl	__init_PMU
	bl	__init_hvmode_206
	mtlr	r11
	beqlr
	li	r0,0
	mtspr	SPRN_PSSCR,r0
	mtspr	SPRN_LPID,r0


Similarly, shouldn't we be doing the PID initialisation there as well?

cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list