[PATCH] powerpc/mm/cxl: Add barrier when setting mm cpumask
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Aug 28 17:59:29 AEST 2017
On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 13:23 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 11:55 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > We need to add memory barrier so that the page table walk doesn't happen
> > > before the cpumask is set and made visible to the other cpus. We need
> > > to use a sync here instead of lwsync because lwsync is not sufficient for
> > > store/load ordering.
> > >
> > > We also need to add an if (mm) check so that we do the right thing when called
> > > with a kernel context. For kernel context, we have mm = NULL. W.r.t kernel
> > > address we can skip setting the mm cpumask.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 0f4bc0932e ("powerpc/mm/cxl: Add the fault handling cpu to mm cpumask")
> > > Cc: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
> > > Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> > > index ab507e4ed69b..caed2a523bee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> > > @@ -141,9 +141,19 @@ int cxl_handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 dsisr, u64 dar)
> > > /*
> > > * Add the fault handling cpu to task mm cpumask so that we
> > > * can do a safe lockless page table walk when inserting the
> > > - * hash page table entry.
> > > + * hash page table entry. This function get called with a
> > > + * valid mm for all user space applications. Hence using
> > > + * if (mm) check is sufficient here.
> > > */
> > > - cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm));
> > > + if (mm) {
> > > + cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm));
> >
> > First test if it's already set as this should be quite common and the
> > cost of setting is a full atomic.
> >
>
> Something like below ?
No, don't use cpumask_test_and_set_cpu, that has extra barriers you
don't want.
Do an
if (!cpumask_test(...)) {
cpumask_set(...);
smp_mb();
}
Like we do in context switch.
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> index caed2a523bee..ccf8568262e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
> @@ -146,13 +146,13 @@ int cxl_handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 dsisr, u64 dar)
> * if (mm) check is sufficient here.
> */
> if (mm) {
> - cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm));
> - /*
> - * We need to make sure we walk the table only after
> - * we update the cpumask. The other side of the barrier is
> - * explained * in serialize_against_pte_lookup()
> - */
> - smp_mb();
> + if (!cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(mm)))
> + /*
> + * We need to make sure we walk the table only after
> + * we update the cpumask. The other side of the barrier
> + * is explained in serialize_against_pte_lookup()
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> }
> if ((result = copro_handle_mm_fault(mm, dar, dsisr, &flt))) {
> pr_devel("copro_handle_mm_fault failed: %#x\n", result);
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list