[PATCH 02/10] powerpc/xive: guest exploitation of the XIVE interrupt controller
David Gibson
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Fri Aug 11 13:55:38 AEST 2017
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:36:04PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 09:19 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > > > > + /* Perform the acknowledge hypervisor to register cycle */
> > > > > > + ack = be16_to_cpu(__raw_readw(xive_tima + TM_SPC_ACK_OS_REG));
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do you need the raw_readw() + be16_to_cpu + mb, rather than one of
> > > > > the higher level IO helpers?
> > > >
> > > > This is one of the many ways to do MMIOs on the TIMA. This memory
> > > > region defines a set of offsets and sizes for which loads and
> > > > stores have different effects.
> > > >
> > > > See the arch/powerpc/include/asm/xive-regs.h file and
> > > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive_template.c for some more usage.
> > >
> > > Sure, much like any IO region. My point is, why do you want this kind
> > > of complex combo, rather than say an in_be16() or readw_be().
> > >
> >
> > The code is inherited from the native backend.
> >
> > I think this is because we know what we are doing and we skip
> > the synchronization routines of the higher level IO helpers.
> > That might not be necessary for sPAPR. Ben ?
>
> It's a performance optimisation, we know we don't need the
> sync,twi,isync crap of the higher level accessor here.
Ok. A comment mentioning this would be good - unless you're very
familiar with the code and hardware it's not going to be obvious if
the nonstandard IO accessors are for legitimate performance reasons,
or just cargo-culting.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20170811/72600d60/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list