[PATCH 02/10] powerpc/xive: guest exploitation of the XIVE interrupt controller
David Gibson
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Thu Aug 10 15:54:26 AEST 2017
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:46:00PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 14:28 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > Also, will POWER9 always have doorbells? In which case you could
> > reduce it to 3 options.
>
> The problem with doorbells on POWER9 guests is that they may have
> to trap and be emulated by the hypervisor, since the guest threads
> on P9 don't have to match the HW threads of the core.
>
> Thus it's quite possible that using XIVE for IPIs is actually faster
> than doorbells in that case.
Ok, well unless there's a compelling reason to use doorbells you can
instead make it 3 cases with POWER9 never using doorbells.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20170810/7eed92d1/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list