[PATCH 02/16] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE

Laurent Dufour ldufour at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Aug 9 20:54:06 AEST 2017


On 09/08/2017 12:08, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:35:35PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> @@ -2295,7 +2302,11 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Re-check the pte - we dropped the lock
>>  	 */
>> -	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
>> +	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) {
>> +		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false);
>> +		ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
>> +		goto oom_free_new;
> 
> With the change, label is misleading.

That's right.
But I'm wondering renaming it out to 'out_free_new' and replacing all the
matching 'goto' where the label was making sense will help readability ?
Have you better idea ?



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list