[PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/mm: Speed up computation of base and actual page size for a HPTE

[Paul Mackerras]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:16:00PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/09/2016 12:08, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h | 37 ++++++++++++
> >> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h      | 87 +++------------------------
> >> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h                |  1 +
> >> >  arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c              | 42 +------------
> >> >  arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c               | 55 +++++++++++++++++
> > This of course touches two maintainers' areas.  Michael and Paolo, how
> > do you want to proceed here?  Can this just go through Michael's tree?
> > Or should I make a topic branch off Linus' tree that you can both
> > pull, or should I split the patch into two (i.e. everything except the
> > kvm_book3s_64.h change in the first patch, and the kvm_book3s_64.h
> > change in the second) and get Michael to put the first one in a topic
> > branch that I can then pull and apply the second patch onto?
> 
> This patch seems separate from the other two (I can't really tell since
> there wasn't a cover letter on linuxppc-dev).  Can you place it in a
> pull request for both Michael and myself?

Yes, it is separate.  I have put it in a new kvm-ppc-infrastructure
branch, which I have merged into my kvm-ppc-next branch (since there
are some other patches on that branch which are prerequisites for some
patches in kvm-ppc-next).  Michael can pull kvm-ppc-infrastructure
when he wants to.  I'll send a pull request for kvm-ppc-next tomorrow
assuming today's linux-next merge doesn't cause any problems.

Paul.