[Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 00/11] implement vcpu preempted check
Pan Xinhui
xinhui at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sat Oct 29 15:37:51 AEDT 2016
在 2016/10/29 03:38, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 写道:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 04:11:16AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> change from v5:
>> spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part.
>> introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached.
>> fix some typos.
>> rebase patch onto 4.9.2
>> change from v4:
>> spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches.
>> add documentation patch.
>> add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen
>> add s390 vcpu preempted check patch
>> change from v3:
>> add x86 vcpu preempted check patch
>> change from v2:
>> no code change, fix typos, update some comments
>> change from v1:
>> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
>> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro.
>> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
>> add more comments
>> thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.
>>
>> This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues.
>
> Do you have a git tree with these patches?
>
Currently no, sorry :(
I make a tar file for this patcheset. Maybe a little easier to apply :)
thanks
xinhui
>>
>> test-case:
>> perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g 400 -p && perf report
>>
>> 18.09% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
>> 12.28% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] rwsem_spin_on_owner
>> 5.27% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_unlock
>> 3.89% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] wait_consider_task
>> 3.64% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _raw_write_lock_irq
>> 3.41% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.is
>> 2.49% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] system_call
>>
>> We introduce interface bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) and use it in some spin
>> loops of osq_lock, rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
>> These spin_on_onwer variant also cause rcu stall before we apply this patch set
>>
>> We also have observed some performace improvements in uninx benchmark tests.
>>
>> PPC test result:
>> 1 copy - 0.94%
>> 2 copy - 7.17%
>> 4 copy - 11.9%
>> 8 copy - 3.04%
>> 16 copy - 15.11%
>>
>> details below:
>> Without patch:
>>
>> 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2188223.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1804433.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1237257.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1032658.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 768000.0 KBps (30.1 s, 1 samples)
>>
>> With patch:
>>
>> 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2209189.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1943816.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1405591.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1065080.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>> 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 904762.0 KBps (30.0 s, 1 samples)
>>
>> X86 test result:
>> test-case after-patch before-patch
>> Execl Throughput | 18307.9 lps | 11701.6 lps
>> File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks | 1352407.3 KBps | 790418.9 KBps
>> File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks | 367555.6 KBps | 222867.7 KBps
>> File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks | 3675649.7 KBps | 1780614.4 KBps
>> Pipe Throughput | 11872208.7 lps | 11855628.9 lps
>> Pipe-based Context Switching | 1495126.5 lps | 1490533.9 lps
>> Process Creation | 29881.2 lps | 28572.8 lps
>> Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) | 23224.3 lpm | 22607.4 lpm
>> Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) | 3531.4 lpm | 3211.9 lpm
>> System Call Overhead | 10385653.0 lps | 10419979.0 lps
>>
>> Christian Borntraeger (1):
>> s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
>>
>> Juergen Gross (1):
>> x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check
>>
>> Pan Xinhui (9):
>> kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
>> locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()
>> kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner
>> powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
>> x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
>> KVM: Introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached
>> x86, kvm/x86.c: support vcpu preempted check
>> x86, kernel/kvm.c: support vcpu preempted check
>> Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
>>
>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt | 9 ++++++++-
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 9 +++++++--
>> arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
>> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 4 +++-
>> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 6 ++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 3 ++-
>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
>> include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>> kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>> 18 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.4.11
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel at lists.xen.org
>> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vcpu.tar
Type: application/x-tar
Size: 81920 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20161029/f9b71477/attachment-0001.tar>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list