[PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Use node ID in init_chip_info
Shilpasri G Bhat
shilpa.bhat at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Oct 20 18:03:56 AEDT 2016
Hi,
On 10/20/2016 09:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> + few IBM guys who have been working on this.
>
> On 19-10-16, 15:02, Emily Shaffer wrote:
>> Fixed assumption that node_id==chip_id in powernv-cpufreq.c:init_chip_info;
>> explicitly use node ID where necessary.
Thanks for the bug fix. I agree that the node-ids should not be assumed to be
always be equal to chip-ids. But I think it would be better to get rid of
cpumask_of_node() as it has problems when the powernv-cpufreq driver is
initialized with offline cpus, like reported in the post below.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8887591/
(^^ This should also solve the node_id=chip_id problem)
Since throttle stats are common for all cpus in the chip, so we are better of
not using cpumask_of_node() instead define something like cpumask_of_chip()
where the driver doesn't have to compute chip cpumask.
Thanks and Regards,
Shilpa
>>
>> Tested: All CPUs report in /sys/devices/system/cpu*/cpufreq/throttle_stats
>>
>> Effort: platforms/arch-powerpc
>> Google-Bug-Id: 26979978
>
> Is this relevant upstream?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer at google.com>
>> Change-Id: I22eb626b32fbb8053b3bbb9c75e677c700d0c2fb
>
> Gerrit id isn't required for upstream..
>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> index d3ffde8..3750b58 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -911,32 +911,47 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver powernv_cpufreq_driver = {
>>
>> static int init_chip_info(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned int chip[256];
>> + int rc = 0;
>> unsigned int cpu, i;
>> unsigned int prev_chip_id = UINT_MAX;
>> + unsigned int *chip, *node;
>> +
>> + chip = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + node = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!chip || !node) {
>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>>
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> unsigned int id = cpu_to_chip_id(cpu);
>>
>> if (prev_chip_id != id) {
>> prev_chip_id = id;
>> - chip[nr_chips++] = id;
>> + node[nr_chips] = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> + chip[nr_chips] = id;
>> + nr_chips++;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> chips = kcalloc(nr_chips, sizeof(struct chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!chips)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + if (!chips) {
>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) {
>> chips[i].id = chip[i];
>> - cpumask_copy(&chips[i].mask, cpumask_of_node(chip[i]));
>> + cpumask_copy(&chips[i].mask, cpumask_of_node(node[i]));
>> INIT_WORK(&chips[i].throttle, powernv_cpufreq_work_fn);
>> for_each_cpu(cpu, &chips[i].mask)
>> per_cpu(chip_info, cpu) = &chips[i];
>> }
>>
>> - return 0;
>> +out:
>> + kfree(node);
>> + kfree(chip);
>> + return rc;
>> }
>>
>> static inline void clean_chip_info(void)
>> --
>> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list