[PATCH kernel v5 5/6] vfio/spapr: Reference mm in tce_container

[Alex Williamson]

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:39:41 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru> wrote:

> On 11/11/16 23:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > In some situations the userspace memory context may live longer than
> > the userspace process itself so if we need to do proper memory context
> > cleanup, we better have tce_container take a reference to mm_struct and
> > use it later when the process is gone (@current or @current->mm is NULL).
> > 
> > This references mm and stores the pointer in the container; this is done
> > in a new helper - tce_iommu_mm_set() - when one of the following happens:
> > - a container is enabled (IOMMU v1);
> > - a first attempt to pre-register memory is made (IOMMU v2);
> > - a DMA window is created (IOMMU v2).
> > The @mm stays referenced till the container is destroyed.
> > 
> > This replaces current->mm with container->mm everywhere except debug
> > prints.
> > 
> > This adds a check that current->mm is the same as the one stored in
> > the container to prevent userspace from making changes to a memory
> > context of other processes.
> > 
> > DMA map/unmap ioctls() do not check for @mm as they already check
> > for @enabled which is set after tce_iommu_mm_set() is called.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
> > ---
> > Changes:
> > v5:
> > * postpone referencing of mm
> > 
> > v4:
> > * added check for container->mm!=current->mm in tce_iommu_ioctl()
> > for all ioctls and removed other redundand checks
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> > index 1c02498..9a81a7e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> > @@ -31,49 +31,49 @@
> >  static void tce_iommu_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
> >  		struct iommu_group *iommu_group);
> >  
> > -static long try_increment_locked_vm(long npages)
> > +static long try_increment_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, long npages)
> >  {
> >  	long ret = 0, locked, lock_limit;
> >  
> > -	if (!current || !current->mm)
> > -		return -ESRCH; /* process exited */
> > +	if (!mm)
> > +		return -EPERM;
> >  
> >  	if (!npages)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > -	down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> > -	locked = current->mm->locked_vm + npages;
> > +	down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +	locked = mm->locked_vm + npages;
> >  	lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >  	if (locked > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))  
> 
> 
> 
> Oh boy. Now it seems I have to reference a task, not just mm (which I may
> not have to reference at all after all as the task reference should keep mm
> alive) as I missed the fact capable() and rlimit() are working with @current.
> 
> 
> Alex,
> 
> Is there anything else I should fix before posting v6? Thanks.

Nope, I was just hoping to see a R-b from David, you guys know the
spapr-tce iommu code far better than me.  Thanks,

Alex