[PATCH v9 12/26] powerpc/powernv/ioda1: M64 support on P7IOC
Gavin Shan
gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu May 5 10:40:33 AEST 2016
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 09:53:51AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>On Wed, 4 May 2016 16:48:53 Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:17:51PM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>> >On Tue, 3 May 2016 15:41:31 Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> This enables M64 window on P7IOC, which has been enabled on PHB3.
>> >
>> >Have we tested that this works with an adaptor? This looks to be enabling
>> >support for something that didn't previously work (64-bit BARs on P7IOC)?
>> >
>>
>> The M64 isn't supported on P7IOC before, meaning the PCI device's M64
>> BAR is covered by PHB's M32 window. With the patch applied, the PCI
>> device's M64 BAR is covered by PHB's M64 window as below log I got
>> from vpl4. The kernel including the series of patches boots successfully
>> on vpl4 and all looks normal.
>
>So you're changing the way 64-bit BARs work on P7IOC to use a different bit of
>the hardware/firmware? This means it could break older systems if there is
>an issue with the M64 support. Other than the comments below the code looks
>reasonable. However I am assuming you've tested that cards with 64-bit BARs
>still function on P7 after this change as I'm not familiar enough to comment on
>the specific hardware details, although your comments make sense and match the
>code.
>
Nope, it doesn't rely on changes in firmware. The old firmware enables and
exposes PHB M64 window. The kernel doesn't use it on P7IOC until this patch.
On VPL4, there is a IPR adapter (0000:60:00.0) as below kernel log indicates.
Its BAR#2 is M64 (64-bits prefetchable) BAR. The BAR#2 is covered by PHB's M64
window with this patch. The PHB's M64 window is [0x00003da800000000..0x00003dafffffffff].
After it's applied, the IPR and root filesystem resident in the disk drive out
of it work fine.
>> [ 0.246110] pci 0000:60:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x3da810000000-0x3da810ffffff 64bit pref]
>> [ 0.246218] pci 0000:60:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x3da081000000-0x3da08103ffff 64bit]
>> [ 0.246306] pci 0000:60:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x3da081040000-0x3da08105ffff pref]
>> [ 0.246392] pci 0000:60 : [PE# 001] Secondary bus 96 associated with PE#1
>> [ 0.246484] pci 0000:60 : [PE# 001] DMA weight 15 (64), assigned (0) 1 DMA32 segments
>> [ 0.246552] pci 0000:60 : [PE# 001] Setting up 32-bit TCE table at 00000000..0fffffff
>>
>> >> Different from PHB3 where 16 M64 BARs are supported and each of
>> >> them can be owned by one particular PE# exclusively or divided
>> >> evenly to 256 segments, every P7IOC PHB has 16 M64 BARs and each
>> >> of them are divided to 8 segments. So every P7IOC PHB supports
>> >> 128 M64 segments in total. P7IOC has M64DT, which helps mapping
>> >> one particular M64 segment# to arbitrary PE#. PHB3 doesn't have
>> >> M64DT, indicating that one M64 segment can only be pinned to the
>> >> fixed PE#.
>> >>
>> >> In order to unified M64 support M64 on P7IOC and PHB3, we just
>> >> provide 128 M64 segments on every P7IOC PHB and each of them is
>> >> pinned to the fixed PE# by bypassing the function of M64DT. In
>> >> turn, we just need different phb->init_m64() for P7IOC and PHB3
>> >> and maps M64 segment in pnv_ioda_reserve_m64_pe() for P7IOC, most
>> >> of the code are shared by them.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 89
>> >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> >> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>> >b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>> >> index 37f22b0..a1b74ec 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>> >> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
>> >> #include "powernv.h"
>> >> #include "pci.h"
>> >>
>> >> +#define PNV_IODA1_M64_NUM 16 /* Number of M64 BARs */
>> >> +#define PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS 8 /* Segments per M64 BAR */
>> >> +
>> >> /* 256M DMA window, 4K TCE pages, 8 bytes TCE */
>> >> #define TCE32_TABLE_SIZE ((0x10000000 / 0x1000) * 8)
>> >>
>> >> @@ -246,6 +249,64 @@ static void pnv_ioda_reserve_dev_m64_pe(struct pci_dev
>> >*pdev,
>> >> }
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> +static int pnv_ioda1_init_m64(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct resource *r;
>> >> + int index;
>> >> +
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * There are 16 M64 BARs, each of which has 8 segments. So
>> >> + * there are as many M64 segments as the maximum number of
>> >> + * PEs, which is 128.
>> >> + */
>> >> + for (index = 0; index < PNV_IODA1_M64_NUM; index++) {
>> >> + unsigned long base, segsz = phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>> >> + int64_t rc;
>> >> +
>> >> + base = phb->ioda.m64_base +
>> >> + index * PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS * segsz;
>> >> + rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id,
>> >> + OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, index, base, 0,
>> >> + PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS * segsz);
>
>Has firmware always supported OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE for P7IOC? If older versions
>don't support it what happens? Do we gracefully fall back to the old mode of
>allocating all BARs from the M32 window or does it break?
>
Old firmware enables and exposes M64 window (OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE), but kernel
doesn't use it until this patch. If the OPAL call fails, errcode is returned.
The caller, pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(), disables the window. It means the PCI
device M64 BARs will fail back to be covered by M32 window. The path is same
on PHB3 and P7IOC.
>> >> + if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>> >> + pr_warn(" Error %lld setting M64 PHB#%d-BAR#%d\n",
>> >> + rc, phb->hose->global_number, index);
>> >> + goto fail;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>> >> + OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, index,
>> >> + OPAL_ENABLE_M64_SPLIT);
>> >> + if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>> >> + pr_warn(" Error %lld enabling M64 PHB#%d-BAR#%d\n",
>> >> + rc, phb->hose->global_number, index);
>> >> + goto fail;
>> >> + }
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Exclude the segment used by the reserved PE, which
>> >> + * is expected to be 0 or last supported PE#.
>> >> + */
>> >> + r = &phb->hose->mem_resources[1];
>> >> + if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == 0)
>> >> + r->start += phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>> >> + else if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == (phb->ioda.total_pe_num - 1))
>> >> + r->end -= phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>> >> + else
>> >> + pr_warn(" Cannot cut M64 segment for reserved PE#%d\n",
>> >> + phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx);
>
>Should this be a WARN_ON()? If this condition can only exist because a future
>programmer changes the reserved_pe_idx then I think it should be a WARN_ON()
>as the above message would be too easy to miss.
>
Yeah, a WARN_ON() should be better.
Thanks,
Gavin
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +
>> >> +fail:
>> >> + for ( ; index >= 0; index--)
>> >> + opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>> >> + OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, index, OPAL_DISABLE_M64);
>> >> +
>> >> + return -EIO;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> static void pnv_ioda_reserve_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> >> unsigned long *pe_bitmap,
>> >> bool all)
>> >> @@ -315,6 +376,26 @@ static unsigned int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus
>> >*bus, bool all)
>> >> pe->master = master_pe;
>> >> list_add_tail(&pe->list, &master_pe->slaves);
>> >> }
>> >> +
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * P7IOC supports M64DT, which helps mapping M64 segment
>> >> + * to one particular PE#. However, PHB3 has fixed mapping
>> >> + * between M64 segment and PE#. In order to have same logic
>> >> + * for P7IOC and PHB3, we enforce fixed mapping between M64
>> >> + * segment and PE# on P7IOC.
>> >> + */
>> >> + if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
>> >> + int64_t rc;
>> >> +
>> >> + rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
>> >> + pe->pe_number, OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
>> >> + pe->pe_number / PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS,
>> >> + pe->pe_number % PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS);
>> >> + if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS)
>> >> + pr_warn("%s: Error %lld mapping M64 for
>> >PHB#%d-PE#%d\n",
>> >> + __func__, rc, phb->hose-
>> >>global_number,
>> >> + pe->pe_number);
>> >> + }
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> kfree(pe_alloc);
>> >> @@ -329,8 +410,7 @@ static void __init pnv_ioda_parse_m64_window(struct
>> >pnv_phb *phb)
>> >> const u32 *r;
>> >> u64 pci_addr;
>> >>
>> >> - /* FIXME: Support M64 for P7IOC */
>> >> - if (phb->type != PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
>> >> + if (phb->type != PNV_PHB_IODA1 && phb->type != PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
>> >> pr_info(" Not support M64 window\n");
>> >> return;
>> >> }
>> >> @@ -364,7 +444,10 @@ static void __init pnv_ioda_parse_m64_window(struct
>> >pnv_phb *phb)
>> >>
>> >> /* Use last M64 BAR to cover M64 window */
>> >> phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx = 15;
>> >> - phb->init_m64 = pnv_ioda2_init_m64;
>> >> + if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1)
>> >> + phb->init_m64 = pnv_ioda1_init_m64;
>> >> + else
>> >> + phb->init_m64 = pnv_ioda2_init_m64;
>> >> phb->reserve_m64_pe = pnv_ioda_reserve_m64_pe;
>> >> phb->pick_m64_pe = pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list