[PATCH v8 42/45] drivers/of: Rename unflatten_dt_node()

Rob Herring robherring2 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 18 00:31:16 AEDT 2016


On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:40:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>> This renames unflatten_dt_node() to unflatten_dt_nodes() as it
>>>>> populates multiple device nodes from FDT blob. No logical changes
>>>>> introduced.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/of/fdt.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>>I'm happy to take patches 40-42 for 4.6 if the rest of the series
>>>>doesn't go in given they fix a separate problem. I just need to know
>>>>soon (or at least they need to go into -next soon).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for quick response, Rob. It depends how much comments I will
>>> receive for the powerpc/powernv part. Except that, all parts including
>>> this one have been ack'ed. I can discuss it with Michael Ellerman.
>>> By the way, how soon you need the decision to merge 40-42? If that's
>>> one or two weeks later, I don't think the reivew on the whole series
>>> can be done.
>>
>>Well, it's been 2 weeks now. I need to know this week.
>>
>>> Also, I think you probably can merge 40-44 as they're all about
>>> fdt.c. If they can be merged at one time, I needn't bother (cc)
>>> you again if I need send a updated revision. Thanks for your
>>> review.
>>
>>I did not include 43 and 44 as they are only needed for the rest of your series.
>>
>
> Rob, sorry for late reponse. I really expect this series to be merged to 4.6 and
> I was checking reviewers' bandwidth to review it. Unfortunately, I didn't receive
> any comments except yours until now. That means this series has to miss 4.6. Please
> pick/merge 41 and 42 if no body has objection. Thanks again for your time on this.

Too late for 4.6.

Rob


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list