[PATCH][v4] livepatch/ppc: Enable livepatching on powerpc

[Miroslav Benes]

Hi,

On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:

> Hi Petr,
> 
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 17:52 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> 
> > From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora at gmail.com>
> >
> > Changelog v4:
> > 	1. Renamed klp_matchaddr() to klp_get_ftrace_location()
> > 	   and used it just to convert the function address.
> > 	2. Synced klp_write_module_reloc() with s390(); made it
> > 	   inline, no error message, return -ENOSYS
> 
> OK.
> 
> > 	3. Added an error message when including
> > 	   powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h without HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> 
> I don't know why we want to do that, I don't see how it is helpful. It doesn't
> even do what it says:
> 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> ...
> > +#else /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> > +#error Include linux/livepatch.h, not asm/livepatch.h
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> 
> If I turn on CONFIG_LIVEPATCH then I can quite happily include asm/livepatch.h
> and not get an error. So the check doesn't do what the message suggests.

Well, yes. I looked into the archives to find if there was a reason to 
even introduce it. It was not. It came up during a review process of the 
livepatching patch set somehow and we left it there. I only changed the 
error message to the mentioned one because we deemed it was better.
 
> If we *really* want to prevent people from including asm/livepatch.h then it
> needs to check for _LINUX_LIVEPATCH_H_. But there's no reason I can see why we
> *must* prevent people from including asm/livepatch.h.
>
> And on x86 & s390 it does:
> 
>   #else
>   #error Live patching support is disabled; check CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
>   #endif
> 
> Which is also not helpful AFAICS, and just likely to break the build for no
> good reason.

This is the old message. See 383bf44d1a8b ("livepatch: change the error 
message in asm/livepatch.h header files").

Anyway, it really does not mean much. I'll send a patch for s390 and x86 
to remove it completely in a minute.

Thanks,
Miroslav