[PATCH v3] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Wed Jun 29 17:37:05 AEST 2016
On 06/29/2016 09:06 AM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> Snooze is a poll idle state in powernv and pseries platforms. Snooze
> has a timeout so that if a cpu stays in snooze for more than target
> residency of the next available idle state, then it would exit thereby
> giving chance to the cpuidle governor to re-evaluate and
> promote the cpu to a deeper idle state. Therefore whenever snooze exits
> due to this timeout, its last_residency will be target_residency of next
> deeper state.
>
> commit e93e59ce5b85 ("cpuidle: Replace ktime_get() with local_clock()")
> changed the math around last_residency calculation. Specifically, while
> converting last_residency value from nanoseconds to microseconds it does
> right shift by 10. Due to this, in snooze timeout exit scenarios
> last_residency calculated is roughly 2.3% less than target_residency of
> next available state. This pattern is picked up get_typical_interval()
> in the menu governor and therefore expected_interval in menu_select() is
> frequently less than the target_residency of any state but snooze.
>
> Due to this we are entering snooze at a higher rate, thereby affecting
> the single thread performance.
>
> Fix this by using a better approximation for division by 1000.
>
> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton at samba.org>
> Bisected-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by David Laight <david.laight at aculab.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Cc'ed Nicolas Pitre]
> ---
> Changes in v3
> =============
> - Using approximation suggested by David
>
> Changes in v2
> =============
> - Fixing it in the cpuidle core code instead of driver code.
>
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 11 +++--------
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index a4d0059..e9a7f74 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> struct cpuidle_state *target_state = &drv->states[index];
> bool broadcast = !!(target_state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
> u64 time_start, time_end;
> - s64 diff;
>
> /*
> * Tell the time framework to switch to a broadcast timer because our
> @@ -218,14 +217,10 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> local_irq_enable();
>
> /*
> - * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, let's shift
> - * by 10 (divide by 1024) to have microsecond based time.
> + * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, convert it to
> + * microsecond based time.
> */
> - diff = (time_end - time_start) >> 10;
> - if (diff > INT_MAX)
> - diff = INT_MAX;
> -
> - dev->last_residency = (int) diff;
> + dev->last_residency = convert_nsec_to_usec(time_end - time_start);
>
> if (entered_state >= 0) {
> /* Update cpuidle counters */
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
> index f87f399..c8ea5ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
> @@ -68,4 +68,27 @@ static inline void cpuidle_coupled_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> }
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * Used for calculating last_residency in usec. Optimized for case
> + * where last_residency in nsecs is < INT_MAX/2 by using faster
> + * approximation. Approximated value has less than 1% error.
> + */
> +static inline int convert_nsec_to_usec(u64 nsec)
> +{
> + if (likely(nsec < INT_MAX / 2)) {
UINT_MAX ?
> + int usec = (int)nsec;
> +
> + usec += usec >> 5;
> + usec = usec >> 10;
> + return usec;
> + } else {
> + u64 usec = div_u64(nsec, 1000);
> +
> + if (usec > INT_MAX)
> + usec = INT_MAX;
> + return (int)usec;
> + }
> +}
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list