[PATCH v2] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Fri Jun 24 20:05:36 AEST 2016
On 06/24/2016 11:00 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Shreyas B. Prabhu
>> Sent: 24 June 2016 09:24
>>
>> Snooze is a poll idle state in powernv and pseries platforms. Snooze
>> has a timeout so that if a cpu stays in snooze for more than target
>> residency of the next available idle state, then it would exit thereby
>> giving chance to the cpuidle governor to re-evaluate and
>> promote the cpu to a deeper idle state. Therefore whenever snooze exits
>> due to this timeout, its last_residency will be target_residency of next
>> deeper state.
>>
>> commit e93e59ce5b85 ("cpuidle: Replace ktime_get() with local_clock()")
>> changed the math around last_residency calculation. Specifically, while
>> converting last_residency value from nanoseconds to microseconds it does
>> right shift by 10. Due to this, in snooze timeout exit scenarios
>> last_residency calculated is roughly 2.3% less than target_residency of
>> next available state. This pattern is picked up get_typical_interval()
>> in the menu governor and therefore expected_interval in menu_select() is
>> frequently less than the target_residency of any state but snooze.
>>
>> Due to this we are entering snooze at a higher rate, thereby affecting
>> the single thread performance.
>>
>> Fix this by replacing right shift by 10 with /1000 while calculating
>> last_residency.
>>
>> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton at samba.org>
>> Bisected-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2
>> =============
>> - Fixing it in the cpuidle core code instead of driver code.
>>
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> index a4d0059..30d67a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> local_irq_enable();
>>
>> /*
>> - * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, let's shift
>> - * by 10 (divide by 1024) to have microsecond based time.
>> + * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, let's
>> + * divide by 1000 to have microsecond based time.
>> */
>> - diff = (time_end - time_start) >> 10;
>> + diff = (time_end - time_start) / 1000;
do_div ?
>> if (diff > INT_MAX)
>> diff = INT_MAX;
>
> The intent of the >> 10 was probably to avoid an expensive 64bit divide.
> So maybe something like:
> diff = time_end - time_start;
> if (diff >= INT_MAX/2)
> diff_32 = INT_MAX/2/1000;
> else
> diff_32 = diff;
> diff_32 += diff_32 >> 6;
> diff_32 >>= 10;
> }
>
> Adding an extra 1/32 makes the division by be something slightly below 1000.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list