[v6, 1/2] cxl: Add mechanism for delivering AFU driver specific events

[Matthew R. Ochs]

> On Jun 21, 2016, at 5:34 AM, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ian,
> 
> Ian Munsie <imunsie at au1.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> Excerpts from Vaibhav Jain's message of 2016-06-20 14:20:16 +0530:
>> 
>> What exactly is the use case for this API? I'd vote to drop it if we can
>> do without it.
> Agree with this. Functionality of this API can be merged with
> cxl_set_driver_ops when called with NULL arg for cxl_afu_driver_ops.

Passing a NULL arg instead of calling an 'unset' API is fine with us.

I'll add that for cxlflash, I can't envision a scenario where we'll unset the
driver ops for a context.