[PATCH v12.update2 02/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address
Yinghai Lu
yinghai at kernel.org
Sat Jun 18 05:25:49 AEST 2016
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:25:52PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> In 8c05cd08a7 ("PCI: fix offset check for sysfs mmapped files"), try
>> to check exposed value with resource start/end in proc mmap path.
>>
>> | start = vma->vm_pgoff;
>> | size = ((pci_resource_len(pdev, resno) - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1;
>> | pci_start = (mmap_api == PCI_MMAP_PROCFS) ?
>> | pci_resource_start(pdev, resno) >> PAGE_SHIFT : 0;
>> | if (start >= pci_start && start < pci_start + size &&
>> | start + nr <= pci_start + size)
>>
>> That breaks sparc that exposed value is BAR value, and need to be offseted
>> to resource address.
>
> I'm not quite sure what you're saying here. Are you saying that sparc
> is currently broken, and this patch fixes it? If so, what exactly is
> broken? Can you give a small example of an mmap that is currently
> broken?
>
>> Original pci_mmap_page_range() is taking PCI BAR value aka usr_address.
>>
>> Bjorn found out that it would be much simple to pass resource address
>> directly and avoid extra those __pci_mmap_make_offset.
>>
>> In this patch:
>> 1. in proc path: proc_bus_pci_mmap, try convert back to resource
>> before calling pci_mmap_page_range
>> 2. in sysfs path: pci_mmap_resource will just offset with resource start.
>> 3. all pci_mmap_page_range will have vma->vm_pgoff with in resource
>> range instead of BAR value.
>> 4. remove __pci_mmap_make_offset, as the checking is done
>> in pci_mmap_fits().
>
> This is a pretty big patch. It would help a lot to split it up.
Looks like they are tight together after change api. vm_pgoff meaning changes.
I could split item 4 to another patch, but compiler could complain or
even refuse to
go on if static functions are defined but not used.
...
>
> I think the comment about "re-enabling the 2 lines below" is pointless
> because doing that would break applications, which I don't think we'll
> do.
>
> I propose the microblaze, powerpc, and sparc patches below, which
> remove simplify pci_resource_to_user() and clean up this comment.
Agreed. Actually I have the change for sparc/PCI in patch 3
sparc/PCI: Use correct offset for bus address to resource
according to previous review.
>> @@ -999,7 +1010,6 @@ static int pci_mmap_resource(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
>> struct resource *res = attr->private;
>> enum pci_mmap_state mmap_type;
>> - resource_size_t start, end;
>> int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < PCI_ROM_RESOURCE; i++)
>> @@ -1008,10 +1018,21 @@ static int pci_mmap_resource(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
>> if (i >= PCI_ROM_RESOURCE)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * resource start have to be PAGE_SIZE aligned, as we pass
>> + * back virt address include round down of resource_start,
>> + * that caller can not figure out directly.
>> + * when it is not aligned, that mean it is io port, should go
>> + * pci_read_resource_io()/pci_write_resource_io() path.
>> + */
>> + if (res->start & ~PAGE_MASK)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> It seems reasonable to require that the mmap start and end be
> page-aligned. It seems like we ought to do the same for the sysfs and
> the procfs paths.
>
> Since we haven't enforced this in the past, there is the potential for
> breaking user programs, isn't there?
>
> The alignment enforcement should be in a patch by itself, so bisection
> would tell us something useful.
ok. will do that.
>
> commit 3dbd970b6d9a96ab471b4b86650a0200a47d375d
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> Date: Thu May 5 11:39:04 2016 -0500
>
> microblaze/PCI: Implement pci_resource_to_user() with pcibios_resource_to_bus()
>
> "User" addresses are shown in /sys/devices/pci.../.../resource and
> /proc/bus/pci/devices and used as mmap offsets for /proc/bus/pci/BB/DD.F
> files. For I/O port resources on microblaze, these are PCI bus addresses,
> i.e., raw BAR values.
>
> Previously pci_resource_to_user() computed the user address by subtracting
> "hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE" from the resource start:
>
> pci_resource_to_user()
> if (IO)
> offset = (unsigned long)hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE;
> *start = rsrc->start - offset;
>
> We've already told the PCI core about that "hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE"
> offset:
>
> pcibios_setup_phb_resources()
> res = &hose->io_resource;
> pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res, hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE);
>
> so pcibios_resource_to_bus() knows how to do that translation.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai at kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> index 1974567..e0dd64e 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
> @@ -444,39 +444,24 @@ void pci_resource_to_user(const struct pci_dev *dev, int bar,
> const struct resource *rsrc,
> resource_size_t *start, resource_size_t *end)
> {
> - struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
> - resource_size_t offset = 0;
> + struct pci_bus_region region;
>
> - if (hose == NULL)
> + if (rsrc->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
> + pcibios_resource_to_bus(dev, ®ion, rsrc);
> + *start = region.start;
> + *end = region.end;
> return;
> + }
>
> - if (rsrc->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
> - offset = (unsigned long)hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE;
> -
> - /* We pass a fully fixed up address to userland for MMIO instead of
> - * a BAR value because X is lame and expects to be able to use that
> - * to pass to /dev/mem !
> + /* We pass a CPU physical address to userland for MMIO instead of a
> + * BAR value because X is lame and expects to be able to use that
> + * to pass to /dev/mem!
> *
> - * That means that we'll have potentially 64 bits values where some
> - * userland apps only expect 32 (like X itself since it thinks only
> - * Sparc has 64 bits MMIO) but if we don't do that, we break it on
> - * 32 bits CHRPs :-(
> - *
> - * Hopefully, the sysfs insterface is immune to that gunk. Once X
> - * has been fixed (and the fix spread enough), we can re-enable the
> - * 2 lines below and pass down a BAR value to userland. In that case
> - * we'll also have to re-enable the matching code in
> - * __pci_mmap_make_offset().
> - *
> - * BenH.
> + * That means we may have 64-bit values where some apps only expect
> + * 32 (like X itself since it thinks only Sparc has 64-bit MMIO).
> */
> -#if 0
> - else if (rsrc->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
> - offset = hose->pci_mem_offset;
> -#endif
> -
> - *start = rsrc->start - offset;
> - *end = rsrc->end - offset;
> + *start = rsrc->start;
> + *end = rsrc->end;
> }
>
> /**
>
> commit 8549d796d788da46236d22be8da283819d5b5a12
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 16 17:47:22 2016 -0500
>
> powerpc/pci: Implement pci_resource_to_user() with pcibios_resource_to_bus()
>
> "User" addresses are shown in /sys/devices/pci.../.../resource and
> /proc/bus/pci/devices and used as mmap offsets for /proc/bus/pci/BB/DD.F
> files. For I/O port resources on powerpc, these are PCI bus addresses,
> i.e., raw BAR values.
>
> Previously pci_resource_to_user() computed the user address by subtracting
> "hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE" from the resource start:
>
> pci_resource_to_user()
> if (IO)
> offset = (unsigned long)hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE;
> *start = rsrc->start - offset;
>
> We've already told the PCI core about that "hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE"
> offset:
>
> pcibios_setup_phb_resources()
> res = &hose->io_resource;
> offset = pcibios_io_space_offset();
> /* i.e., "offset = hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE" */
> pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res, offset);
>
> so pcibios_resource_to_bus() knows how to do that translation.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai at kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index 8c6beb0..16d9e14 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -581,39 +581,24 @@ void pci_resource_to_user(const struct pci_dev *dev, int bar,
> const struct resource *rsrc,
> resource_size_t *start, resource_size_t *end)
> {
> - struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
> - resource_size_t offset = 0;
> + struct pci_bus_region region;
>
> - if (hose == NULL)
> + if (rsrc->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
> + pcibios_resource_to_bus(dev, ®ion, rsrc);
> + *start = region.start;
> + *end = region.end;
> return;
> + }
>
> - if (rsrc->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
> - offset = (unsigned long)hose->io_base_virt - _IO_BASE;
> -
> - /* We pass a fully fixed up address to userland for MMIO instead of
> - * a BAR value because X is lame and expects to be able to use that
> - * to pass to /dev/mem !
> - *
> - * That means that we'll have potentially 64 bits values where some
> - * userland apps only expect 32 (like X itself since it thinks only
> - * Sparc has 64 bits MMIO) but if we don't do that, we break it on
> - * 32 bits CHRPs :-(
> - *
> - * Hopefully, the sysfs insterface is immune to that gunk. Once X
> - * has been fixed (and the fix spread enough), we can re-enable the
> - * 2 lines below and pass down a BAR value to userland. In that case
> - * we'll also have to re-enable the matching code in
> - * __pci_mmap_make_offset().
> + /* We pass a CPU physical address to userland for MMIO instead of a
> + * BAR value because X is lame and expects to be able to use that
> + * to pass to /dev/mem!
> *
> - * BenH.
> + * That means we may have 64-bit values where some apps only expect
> + * 32 (like X itself since it thinks only Sparc has 64-bit MMIO).
> */
> -#if 0
> - else if (rsrc->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
> - offset = hose->pci_mem_offset;
> -#endif
> -
> - *start = rsrc->start - offset;
> - *end = rsrc->end - offset;
> + *start = rsrc->start;
> + *end = rsrc->end;
> }
>
> /**
>
> commit 2ad70d5e96f3945656cfca8c005384f2a858a8c5
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> Date: Thu May 5 10:56:58 2016 -0500
>
> sparc/PCI: Implement pci_resource_to_user() with pcibios_resource_to_bus()
>
> "User" addresses are shown in /sys/devices/pci.../.../resource and
> /proc/bus/pci/devices and used as mmap offsets for /proc/bus/pci/BB/DD.F
> files. On sparc, these are PCI bus addresses, i.e., raw BAR values.
>
> Previously pci_resource_to_user() computed the user address by
> subtracting either pbm->io_space.start or pbm->mem_space.start from the
> resource start.
>
> We've already told the PCI core about those offsets here:
>
> pci_scan_one_pbm()
> pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &pbm->io_space, pbm->io_space.start);
> pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &pbm->mem_space, pbm->mem_space.start);
> pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &pbm->mem64_space, pbm->mem_space.start);
>
> so pcibios_resource_to_bus() knows how to do that translation.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> index c2b202d..a4f158b 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -986,16 +986,18 @@ void pci_resource_to_user(const struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
> const struct resource *rp, resource_size_t *start,
> resource_size_t *end)
> {
> - struct pci_pbm_info *pbm = pdev->dev.archdata.host_controller;
> - unsigned long offset;
> -
> - if (rp->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
> - offset = pbm->io_space.start;
> - else
> - offset = pbm->mem_space.start;
> + struct pci_bus_region region;
>
> - *start = rp->start - offset;
> - *end = rp->end - offset;
> + /*
> + * "User" addresses are shown in /sys/devices/pci.../.../resource
> + * and /proc/bus/pci/devices and used as mmap offsets for
> + * /proc/bus/pci/BB/DD.F files (see proc_bus_pci_mmap()).
> + *
> + * On sparc, these are PCI bus addresses, i.e., raw BAR values.
> + */
> + pcibios_resource_to_bus(pdev->bus, ®ion, rp);
> + *start = region.start;
> + *end = region.end;
> }
>
> void pcibios_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev)
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai at kernel.org>
Will drop related change in sparc/PCI: Use correct offset for bus
address to resource
and respin the whole patchset today.
Thanks
Yinghai
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list