[PATCH 02/14] seccomp: Add a seccomp_data parameter secure_computing()
Kees Cook
keescook at chromium.org
Fri Jun 10 07:01:52 AEST 2016
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
Currently, if arch code wants to supply seccomp_data directly to
seccomp (which is generally much faster than having seccomp do it
using the syscall_get_xyz() API), it has to use the two-phase
seccomp hooks. Add it to the easy hooks, too.
Cc: linux-arch at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/tile/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c | 2 +-
include/linux/seccomp.h | 8 ++++----
kernel/seccomp.c | 4 ++--
11 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
index ef9119f7462e..ad5e90ab165c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno)
/* Do the secure computing check first; failures should be fast. */
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1)
return -1;
#else
/* XXX: remove this once OABI gets fixed */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index 3f6cd5c5234f..6e2cf046615d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/* Do the secure computing check first; failures should be fast. */
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1)
return -1;
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
index 0dcf69194473..c50af846ecf9 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ asmlinkage long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall)
current_thread_info()->syscall = syscall;
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1)
return -1;
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) &&
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
index b5458b37fc5b..8edc47c0b98e 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ long compat_arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, compat_long_t request,
long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/* Do the secure computing check first. */
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1)
return -1;
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) &&
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
index 30a03c03fe73..ed799e994773 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ static int do_seccomp(struct pt_regs *regs)
* have already loaded -ENOSYS into r3, or seccomp has put
* something else in r3 (via SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO/TRACE).
*/
- if (__secure_computing())
+ if (__secure_computing(NULL))
return -1;
/*
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
index 49b1c13bf6c9..c238e9958c2a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
long ret = 0;
/* Do the secure computing check first. */
- if (secure_computing()) {
+ if (secure_computing(NULL)) {
/* seccomp failures shouldn't expose any additional code. */
ret = -1;
goto out;
diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/tile/kernel/ptrace.c
index 54e7b723db99..8c6d2f2fefa3 100644
--- a/arch/tile/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/tile/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ int do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
u32 work = ACCESS_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1)
return -1;
if (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) {
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
index 48b0dcbd87be..9c5570f0f397 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ void handle_syscall(struct uml_pt_regs *r)
PT_REGS_SET_SYSCALL_RETURN(regs, -ENOSYS);
/* Do the secure computing check first; failures should be fast. */
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1)
return;
if (syscall_trace_enter(regs))
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
index 174c2549939d..85acde5fa442 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
*/
regs->orig_ax = syscall_nr;
regs->ax = -ENOSYS;
- tmp = secure_computing();
+ tmp = secure_computing(NULL);
if ((!tmp && regs->orig_ax != syscall_nr) || regs->ip != address) {
warn_bad_vsyscall(KERN_DEBUG, regs,
"seccomp tried to change syscall nr or ip");
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
index 2296e6b2f690..9eaa7b34d6da 100644
--- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ struct seccomp {
};
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-extern int __secure_computing(void);
-static inline int secure_computing(void)
+extern int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd);
+static inline int secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
{
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP)))
- return __secure_computing();
+ return __secure_computing(sd);
return 0;
}
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct seccomp { };
struct seccomp_filter { };
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
+static inline int secure_computing(struct seccomp_data *sd) { return 0; }
#else
static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; }
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 7002796f14a4..06816290a212 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -554,9 +554,9 @@ void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall)
BUG();
}
#else
-int __secure_computing(void)
+int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
{
- u32 phase1_result = seccomp_phase1(NULL);
+ u32 phase1_result = seccomp_phase1(sd);
if (likely(phase1_result == SECCOMP_PHASE1_OK))
return 0;
--
2.7.4
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list