Kernel 4.7: PAGE_GUARDED and _PAGE_NO_CACHE

[Christian Zigotzky]

Hi Darren,

Many thanks for your help. I started my bisect with the following commits:

git bisect start

git bisect good 8ffb4103f5e28d7e7890ed4774d8e009f253f56e

git bisect bad 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864 (Linux 4.7-rc1)

Did you start your bisect with the same bad and good commit?

I will revert your bad commit and compile a new test kernel.

Thanks,

Christian

On 08 June 2016 at 1:33 PM, Darren Stevens wrote:
> Hello Christian
>
> That's not where I ended up with my bisect, this commit is about 10 before the
> one I found to be bad, which is:
>
> commit d6a9996e84ac4beb7713e9485f4563e100a9b03e
> Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date:   Fri Apr 29 23:26:21 2016 +1000
>
>      powerpc/mm: vmalloc abstraction in preparation for radix
>      
>      The vmalloc range differs between hash and radix config. Hence make
>      VMALLOC_START and related constants a variable which will be runtime
>      initialized depending on whether hash or radix mode is active.
>      
>      Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>      [mpe: Fix missing init of ioremap_bot in pgtable_64.c for ppc64e]
>      Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>
> Not sure how we are getting different results though. I have attached my
> bisect log and the suspect commit, whcih is quite large. I'm not sure which
> part of it is at fault. I have some jobs to do now, but hope to get tesing
> this later today.
>
> Regards
> Darren