[PATCH v3] powerpc: spinlock: Fix spin_unlock_wait()

Peter Zijlstra peterz at infradead.org
Wed Jun 8 22:35:07 AEST 2016


On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:20:45PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 16:46 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:17:25PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 13:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:42:20PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Why the move to in-line this implementation? It looks like a fairly big
> > > > function.
> > > 
> > > I agree it's not pretty.
> > 
> > > I'm not beholden to v3 though if you hate it.
> > 
> > I don't mind; its just that I am in a similar boat with qspinlock and
> > chose the other option. So I just figured I'd ask :-)
> 
> OK. I'll go with inline and we'll see which version gets "cleaned-up" by a
> janitor first ;)

Ok; what tree does this go in? I have this dependent series which I'd
like to get sorted and merged somewhere.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list