[PATCH v3] kallsyms: add support for relative offsets in kallsyms address table

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Fri Jan 22 14:44:42 AEDT 2016


On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 14:55 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:19:43 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Similar to how relative extables are implemented, it is possible to emit
> > > the kallsyms table in such a way that it contains offsets relative to some
> > > anchor point in the kernel image rather than absolute addresses. The benefit
> > > is that such table entries are no longer subject to dynamic relocation when
> > > the build time and runtime offsets of the kernel image are different. Also,
> > > on 64-bit architectures, it essentially cuts the size of the address table
> > > in half since offsets can typically be expressed in 32 bits.
> > > 
> > > Since it is useful for some architectures (like x86) to retain the ability
> > > to emit absolute values as well, this patch adds support for both, by
> > > emitting absolute addresses as positive 32-bit values, and addresses
> > > relative to the lowest encountered relative symbol as negative values, which
> > > are subtracted from the runtime address of this base symbol to produce the
> > > actual address.
> > > 
> > > Support for the above is enabled by default for all architectures except
> > > IA-64, whose symbols are too far apart to capture in this manner.
> > 
> > I'm not really understanding the benefits of this.  A smaller address
> > table is nice, but why is it desirable that "such table entries are no
> > longer subject to dynamic relocation when the build time and runtime
> > offsets of the kernel image are different"?
> 
> IIUC, this means that the relocation work done after decompression now
> doesn't have to do relocation updates for all these values, which
> means a smaller relocation table as well.

Yep. If I remember the figures rightly it saves ~250K of relocations for the
powerpc build.

cheers



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list