[PATCH] qe_ic: fix a buffer overflow error and add check elsewhere
Zhao Qiang
qiang.zhao at nxp.com
Thu Jan 21 12:06:04 AEDT 2016
127 is the theoretical up boundary of QEIC number,
in fact there only be 44 qe_ic_info now.
add check to overflow for qe_ic_info
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao at nxp.com>
---
drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c
index 5419527..90c00b7 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c
@@ -261,6 +261,11 @@ static int qe_ic_host_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
struct qe_ic *qe_ic = h->host_data;
struct irq_chip *chip;
+ if (hw >= ARRAY_SIZE(qe_ic_info)) {
+ pr_err("%s: Invalid hw irq number for QEIC\n", __func__);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (qe_ic_info[hw].mask == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Can't map reserved IRQ\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -409,7 +414,8 @@ int qe_ic_set_priority(unsigned int virq, unsigned int priority)
if (priority > 8 || priority == 0)
return -EINVAL;
- if (src > 127)
+ if (WARN_ONCE(src >= ARRAY_SIZE(qe_ic_info),
+ "%s: Invalid hw irq number for QEIC\n", __func__))
return -EINVAL;
if (qe_ic_info[src].pri_reg == 0)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -438,6 +444,9 @@ int qe_ic_set_high_priority(unsigned int virq, unsigned int priority, int high)
if (priority > 2 || priority == 0)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (WARN_ONCE(src >= ARRAY_SIZE(qe_ic_info),
+ "%s: Invalid hw irq number for QEIC\n", __func__))
+ return -EINVAL;
switch (qe_ic_info[src].pri_reg) {
case QEIC_CIPZCC:
--
2.1.0.27.g96db324
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list