[PATCH V6 20/35] powerpc/mm: Don't track subpage valid bit in pte_t
Paul Mackerras
paulus at ozlabs.org
Thu Feb 18 12:11:52 AEDT 2016
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:06:45AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This free up 11 bits in pte_t. In the later patch we also change
> the pte_t format so that we can start supporting migration pte
> at pmd level. We now track 4k subpage valid bit as below
>
> If we have _PAGE_COMBO set, we override the _PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT
> and _PAGE_F_SECOND. Together we have 4 bits, each of them
> used to indicate whether any of the 4 4k subpage in that group
> is valid. ie,
>
> [ group 1 bit ] [ group 2 bit ] ..... [ group 4 ]
> [ subpage 1 - 4] [ subpage 5- 8] ..... [ subpage 13 - 16]
>
> We still track each 4k subpage slot number and secondary hash
> information in the second half of pgtable_t. Removing the subpage
> tracking have some significant overhead on aim9 and ebizzy benchmark and
> to support THP with 4K subpage, we do need a pgtable_t of 4096 bytes.
I know this has already been applied, but this hunk looks wrong:
> @@ -102,7 +131,7 @@ int __hash_page_4K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
> */
> if (!(old_pte & _PAGE_COMBO)) {
> flush_hash_page(vpn, rpte, MMU_PAGE_64K, ssize, flags);
> - old_pte &= ~_PAGE_HPTE_SUB;
> + old_pte &= ~_PAGE_HASHPTE | _PAGE_F_GIX | _PAGE_F_SECOND;
Shouldn't this be:
+ old_pte &= ~(_PAGE_HASHPTE | _PAGE_F_GIX | _PAGE_F_SECOND);
instead?
Paul.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list