Failure on latest GIT - appletouch fails to register

[Mike]

Not made any less confusing with the presence of the evdev event4 and
correct /dev/input/mouse ... cat on the device indicates no input is
passed. Xorg correctly finds and assigns the pad and functions, evdev sets
it up... But no inputs registered, i cannot spot any changes comparing to
4.3.3 that would account for this ...

On 3 February 2016 at 00:05, Mike <michael.heltne at gmail.com> wrote:

> Normally as far as i can tell it should register it as input and that's
> not happening, verified the config entry CONFIG_MOUSE_APPLETOUCH is
> selected and compiled in both tests i've done for rc-1 and rc-2.
>
> syslog.1:Feb  1 21:58:40 PowerBook-G4 kernel: [   14.744538] usbcore:
> registered new interface driver appletouch
> syslog.1:Feb  1 22:28:05 PowerBook-G4 kernel: [   14.904449] input:
> appletouch as /devices/pci0001:10/0001:10:1a.0/usb2/2-2/2-2:1.1/input/input6
> syslog.1:Feb  1 22:28:05 PowerBook-G4 kernel: [   14.905904] usbcore:
> registered new interface driver appletouch
> syslog.1:Feb  2 03:39:38 PowerBook-G4 kernel: [   15.423289] usbcore:
> registered new interface driver appletouch
>
> Any clues? Worked in 4.3.3 at least . Anyone point me to where i could
> begin to look? Any structures changed which could account for this?
>
>
> On 2 February 2016 at 17:55, Mike <michael.heltne at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Agreed, raised an eyebrow initially when select ppc64 and 32 :D
>>
>> I'll give a word on the trackpad issue later, cant remember seeing any
>> changes that ought effect it really. guess the compile is done in a good
>> hour or so, took the tiime to slim it down to someting reasonable
>>
>> Thanks man
>> On 2 Feb 2016 18:14, "Pranith Kumar" <bobby.prani at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
>>> <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > This patch didn't work for you ?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://mid.gmane.org/1454086969-21074-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> This actually is a better patch. I didn't realize that we have the _64
>>> version.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> --
>>> Pranith
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20160203/0bf378f3/attachment.html>