[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: remove explicit register defaults

[Maciej S. Szmigiero]

Hi Fabio,

On 01.02.2016 13:05, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
> <mail at maciej.szmigiero.name> wrote:
>> There is no guarantee that on fsl_ssi module load
>> SSI registers will have their power-on-reset values.
>>
>> In fact, if the driver is reloaded the values in
>> registers will be whatever they were set to previously.
>>
>> However, the cache needs to be fully populated at probe
>> time to avoid non-atomic allocations during register
>> access.
>>
>> Special case here is imx21-class SSI, since
>> according to datasheet it don't have SACC{ST,EN,DIS}
>> regs.
>>
>> This fixes hard lockup on fsl_ssi module reload,
>> at least in AC'97 mode.
>>
>> Fixes: 05cf237972fe ("ASoC: fsl_ssi: Add driver suspend and resume to support MEGA Fast")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail at maciej.szmigiero.name>
> 
> I know I have already tested this and it worked fine on a mx6sabresd,
> but running linux-next 20160201 on a mx6sl-evk the ssi driver does not
> probe anymore:
> 
> [    2.216954] fsl-asoc-card sound: ASoC: CPU DAI (null) not registered
> [    2.223412] fsl-asoc-card sound: snd_soc_register_card failed (-517)
> [    2.230258] imx-wm8962 sound: ASoC: CPU DAI 202c000.ssi not registered
> [    2.236806] imx-wm8962 sound: snd_soc_register_card failed (-517)
> [    2.244782] snvs_rtc 20cc000.snvs:snvs-rtc-lp: setting system clock
> to 1970-01-01 00:01:14 UTC (74)
> [    2.285864] fsl-asoc-card sound: ASoC: CPU DAI (null) not registered
> [    2.292335] fsl-asoc-card sound: snd_soc_register_card failed (-517)
> [    2.299572] imx-wm8962 sound: ASoC: CPU DAI 202c000.ssi not registered
> [    2.306121] imx-wm8962 sound: snd_soc_register_card failed (-517)
> 
> Reverting this patch fixes the problem.
> 
> Wandboard also has the same issue:
> 
> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20160201/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks
> 

Is regmap patch from 
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2161934.html
applied to the tested tree?

Best regards,
Maciej