[PATCH v4 12/12] powerpc: Rename soft_enabled to soft_disabled_mask
Nicholas Piggin
npiggin at gmail.com
Tue Dec 20 13:58:41 AEDT 2016
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:37:08 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Rename the paca->soft_enabled to paca->soft_disabled_mask as
> it is no more used as a flag for interrupt state.
>
This makes it much more readable, thanks. I have a question which
isn't part of this patch but I just notice it now:
> @@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
> #define hard_irq_disable() do { \
> u8 _was_enabled; \
> __hard_irq_disable(); \
> - _was_enabled = local_paca->soft_enabled; \
> - local_paca->soft_enabled = IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX;\
> + _was_enabled = local_paca->soft_disabled_mask; \
> + local_paca->soft_disabled_mask = IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX;\
> local_paca->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS; \
> if (_was_enabled == IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_NONE) \
> trace_hardirqs_off(); \
trace_hardirqs_off() is the Linux interrupt disable, i.e., the MASK_LINUX
bit. So I think the test should be:
if (!(_was_enabled & IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX))
After your rename it should be called _was_masked instead I guess.
Also I suppose the new soft disable mask should include all interrupt
bits, shouldn't it? It would be confusing to get the situation where
hard_irq_disable() strips the PMU bit off the mask. If you agree, then
it would be good to add IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_ALL define where the bits are
defined.
Thanks,
Nick
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list