[PATCH v3 02/15] x86/entry: define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK flags explicitly

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:17:35PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2016-12-08 12:08:27, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK macro automatically includes the least-significant
> > 16 bits of the thread_info flags, which is less than obvious and tends
> > to create confusion and surprises when reading or modifying the code.
> > 
> > Define the flags explicitly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 9 ++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > index ad6f5eb0..1fe6043 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> > @@ -73,9 +73,6 @@ struct thread_info {
> >   * thread information flags
> >   * - these are process state flags that various assembly files
> >   *   may need to access
> > - * - pending work-to-be-done flags are in LSW
> 
> Yup, this is not true because also some flags from the most
> significant bits are in the _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK.
> 
> > - * - other flags in MSW
> > - * Warning: layout of LSW is hardcoded in entry.S
> >   */
> >  #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	0	/* syscall trace active */
> >  #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	1	/* callback before returning to user */
> > @@ -133,8 +130,10 @@ struct thread_info {
> >  
> >  /* work to do on any return to user space */
> >  #define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK						\
> > -	((0x0000FFFF & ~_TIF_SECCOMP) | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT |	\
> > -	_TIF_NOHZ)
> > +	(_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_SIGPENDING |	\
> > +	 _TIF_SINGLESTEP | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU |	\
> > +	 _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY | _TIF_UPROBE |	\
> > +	 _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_NOHZ)
> 
> All flags are sorted by the number except for
> _TIF_SINGLESTEP and _TIF_NEED_RESCHED  ;-)

You're right, I'll swap them :-)

> 
> The patch does not change the existing behavior. The same
> existing flags are listed.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek at suse.com>
> 
> Best Regards,
> Petr

-- 
Josh