Setting some clocks back to DUMMY fixes spdif output on imx6q wandboard rev B1

Xavi Drudis Ferran xdrudis at tinet.cat
Tue Aug 30 05:54:28 AEST 2016


El Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:28:21PM -0700, Nicolin Chen deia:
> 
> Yes, it seems that it also tried to correct the clock sources
> as those were not available when adding the S/PDIF support at
> the first place.
>

I wonder if maybe they need to be defined, assigned or somehow listed
elsewhere and they are not for wandboard quad (but are for other boards)?
 
> > The issue is fixed for me with this patch but I'm not sure what's the
> > best way to help fix any issue someone else may have or what other
> > info or test you might need. Any guidance welcome. 
> 
> > --- linux-4.7-no-spdif-out/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi	2016-07-25 00:19:43.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-4.7/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi	2016-08-28 17:59:14.276774409 +0200
> > @@ -240,9 +240,9 @@
> >  					       <&sdma 15 18 0>;
> >  					dma-names = "rx", "tx";
> >  					clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_SPDIF_GCLK>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_OSC>,
> > -						 <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_SPDIF>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ASRC>,
> > -						 <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_DUMMY>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ESAI_EXTAL>,
> > -						 <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_IPG>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_MLB>,
> > +						 <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_SPDIF>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_DUMMY>,
> > +						 <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_DUMMY>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_DUMMY>,
> > +						 <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_DUMMY>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_DUMMY>,
> >  						 <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_DUMMY>, <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_SPBA>;
> >  					clock-names = "core",  "rxtx0",
> >  						      "rxtx1", "rxtx2",
> 

> This looks like that you merely revert the SPDIF_GCLK. 

I revert only some clocks, yes. I left SPDIF_GCLK and CLK_SBPA intact.
So it is a partial revert of the commit.

> Would you
> please do a little debug using "#define DEBUG 1" and check printk
> from fsl_spdif_probe_txclk() to see the difference between before
> and after Shengjiu's commit?

Yes, but I'm compiling the kernel in the wandboard, so it'll take me some time. 

Thank you. 


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list