[PATCH v3 02/21] powerpc: Always restore FPU/VEC/VSX if hardware transactional memory in use

[Michael Neuling]

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 13:43 +1000, Cyril Bur wrote:
> Comment from arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c:967:
>  If userspace is inside a transaction (whether active or
>  suspended) and FP/VMX/VSX instructions have ever been enabled
>  inside that transaction, then we have to keep them enabled
>  and keep the FP/VMX/VSX state loaded while ever the transaction
>  continues.  The reason is that if we didn't, and subsequently
>  got a FP/VMX/VSX unavailable interrupt inside a transaction,
>  we don't know whether it's the same transaction, and thus we
>  don't know which of the checkpointed state and the ransactional
>  state to use.
> 
> restore_math() restore_fp() and restore_altivec() currently may not
> restore the registers. It doesn't appear that this is more serious
> than a performance penalty. If the math registers aren't restored the
> userspace thread will still be run with the facility disabled.
> Userspace will not be able to read invalid values. On the first access
> it will take an facility unavailable exception and the kernel will
> detected an active transaction, at which point it will abort the
> transaction. There is the possibility for a pathological case
> preventing any progress by transactions, however, transactions
> are never guaranteed to make progress.
> 
> Fixes: 70fe3d9 ("powerpc: Restore FPU/VEC/VSX if previously used")
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur at gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index 58ccf86..cdf2d20 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,13 @@ static void check_if_tm_restore_required(struct
> task_struct *tsk)
>  		set_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_TM);
>  	}
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool msr_tm_active(unsigned long msr)
> +{
> +	return MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr);
> +}

I'm not sure what value this function is adding.  The MSR_TM_ACTIVE() is
used in a lot of other places and is well known so I'd prefer to just keep
using it, rather than adding some other abstraction that others have to
learn.

Other than that, the patch seems good.  

Mikey

>  #else
> +static inline bool msr_tm_active(unsigned long msr) { return false; }
>  static inline void check_if_tm_restore_required(struct task_struct *tsk)
> { }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM */
>  
> @@ -208,7 +214,7 @@ void enable_kernel_fp(void)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(enable_kernel_fp);
>  
>  static int restore_fp(struct task_struct *tsk) {
> -	if (tsk->thread.load_fp) {
> +	if (tsk->thread.load_fp || msr_tm_active(tsk->thread.regs->msr)) 
> {
>  		load_fp_state(&current->thread.fp_state);
>  		current->thread.load_fp++;
>  		return 1;
> @@ -278,7 +284,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_altivec_to_thread);
>  
>  static int restore_altivec(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> -	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC) && tsk->thread.load_vec) {
> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC) &&
> +		(tsk->thread.load_vec || msr_tm_active(tsk->thread.regs-
> >msr))) {
>  		load_vr_state(&tsk->thread.vr_state);
>  		tsk->thread.used_vr = 1;
>  		tsk->thread.load_vec++;
> @@ -464,7 +471,8 @@ void restore_math(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	unsigned long msr;
>  
> -	if (!current->thread.load_fp && !loadvec(current->thread))
> +	if (!msr_tm_active(regs->msr) &&
> +		!current->thread.load_fp && !loadvec(current->thread))
>  		return;
>  
>  	msr = regs->msr;
> @@ -983,6 +991,13 @@ void restore_tm_state(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	msr_diff = current->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & ~regs->msr;
>  	msr_diff &= MSR_FP | MSR_VEC | MSR_VSX;
>  
> +	/* Ensure that restore_math() will restore */
> +	if (msr_diff & MSR_FP)
> +		current->thread.load_fp = 1;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ALIVEC
> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC) && msr_diff & MSR_VEC)
> +		current->thread.load_vec = 1;
> +#endif
>  	restore_math(regs);
>  
>  	regs->msr |= msr_diff;