[PATCH 0867/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Geoff Levand
geoff at infradead.org
Wed Aug 3 02:45:29 AEST 2016
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 19:53 +0800, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access
> permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
> corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of
> the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni at intel.com>
> ---
>
> static int timeout = 5000; /* in msec ( 5 sec ) */
> -module_param(timeout, int, 0644);
> +module_param(timeout, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
To me, 644 is more 'readable', and as for robustness, the meaning of
644 will never change.
-Geoff
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list