[PATCH 04/14] ARM: dts: OMAP36xx: : DT spelling s/#address-cell/#address-cells/

Tony Lindgren tony at atomide.com
Wed Apr 27 02:08:31 AEST 2016


* Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org> [160420 16:48]:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas at glider.be> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
> > index ce1e242d4dc07ea8..8b797915300894d8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
> > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> >                 abb_mpu_iva: regulator-abb-mpu {
> >                         compatible = "ti,abb-v1";
> >                         regulator-name = "abb_mpu_iva";
> > -                       #address-cell = <0>;
> > +                       #address-cells = <0>;
> 
> dtc should flag this if it was really needed. However, it looks like
> it isn't as there are no child nodes (unless the board files add
> them).
> 
> A nice dtc check would be to flag unnecessary #address-cells or
> #size-cells. That would only help here after your fix though.

Yeah. Applying patches 2 - 4 into omap-for-v4.7/dt thanks.

Tony


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list