[PATCH v8 21/45] powerpc/powernv: Create PEs at PCI hot plugging time

Gavin Shan gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Apr 20 13:35:11 AEST 2016


On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:00:38PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 04/20/2016 11:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:16:42PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>On 02/17/2016 02:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>>Currently, the PEs and their associated resources are assigned
>>>>in ppc_md.pcibios_fixup() except those used by SRIOV VFs.
>>>
>>>But this new code does not affect IOV and VF's PEs will still be created
>>>somewhere else rather than pnv_pci_setup_bridge()?
>>>
>>
>>Correct. VF PEs cannot be created in pnv_pci_setup_bridge() as the PF's
>>IOV capability isn't enabled at that point.
>>
>>>
>>>>The
>>>>function is called for once after PCI probing and resources
>>>>assignment is completed. So it isn't hotplug friendly.
>>>>
>>>>This creates PEs dynamically by ppc_md.pcibios_setup_bridge(), which
>>>>is called on the event during system bootup and PCI hotplug: updating
>>>>PCI bridge's windows after resource assignment/reassignment are done.
>>>>For partial hotplug case, where not all PCI devices belonging to the
>>>>PE are unplugged and plugged again, we just need unbinding/binding
>>>>the affected PCI devices with the corresponding PE without creating
>>>>new one.
>>>>
>>>>As there is no upstream bridge for root bus that needs to be covered
>>>>by PE, we have to create PE for root bus in ppc_md.pcibios_setup_bridge()
>>>>before any other PEs can be created, as PE for root bus is the ancestor
>>>>to anyone else.
>>>
>>>We did not need a root bus PE before? What is the other PE reserved for?
>>>Comments only say "reserved"...
>>>
>>
>>No, A PE for root bus is needed before.
>
>Ok. We needed a PE for the root bus and we need it now. What changed? Why do
>you reserve another PE?
>

Originally, all PEs (include the one for root bus) were created at PHB fixup time
in pnv_pci_ioda_fixup(). With this patch, all PEs are created in pnv_pci_setup_bridge().
pnv_pci_setup_bridge() is called for every PCI buses other than root bus. It means
pnv_pci_setup_bridge() isn't called for root bus. So we have to create PE for root
bus before the left PEs are created there. The PE# for root bus is reserved in advance
and used in pnv_pci_setup_bridge() at that point.

>
>>
>other PEs can be for the PCI bus
>>originated from root port and the subordinate domains.
>>
>>>>
>>>>Also, the windows of root port or the upstream port of PCIe switch behind
>>>>root port are extended to be PHB's apertures to accommodate the additional
>>>>resources needed by newly plugged devices based on the fact: hotpluggable
>>>>slot is behind root port or downstream port of the PCIe switch behind
>>>>root port. The extension for those PCI brdiges' windows is done in
>>>>ppc_md.pcibios_setup_bridge() as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>This patch seems to be doing way too many things, hard to follow.
>>>
>>>Could you please split the patch into smaller chunks? For example (you can do
>>>it totally different):
>>>- move pnv_pci_ioda_setup_opal_tce_kill()
>>>- move PE creation from pnv_pci_ioda_fixup() to pnv_pci_setup_bridge();
>>>- add pnv_pci_fixup_bridge_resources()
>>>- add an extra reserved PE for the root bus (and all this magic with
>>>root_pe_idx/root_pe_populated)
>>>- ...
>>>
>>
>>I'll evaluate it later. It's always nice to have small patches. Thanks
>>for the comments.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Alexey
>>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>>the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Alexey
>



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list