[PATCH 0/2] perf probe fixes for ppc64le
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Mon Apr 11 14:41:46 AEST 2016
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 19:12 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>
> I suppose this boils down to the quirkiness of ABIv2. Though, in
> reality, I don't think most users will notice. As I stated above, users
> will most likely start with the disassembly or debuginfo and this patch
> ensures there are actually no surprises there.
Yeah it's unfortunate that we have to handle these two cases differently.
But I think you've chosen the right trade off.
When we are just given the name we *must not* use the global entry point,
otherwise the probes will often not hit - because most calls go to the local
entry point and skip the global entry point entirely.
When we're given a name and offset, it's less confusing if we use the global
entry point as the base for the offset calculation.
So for the concept:
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
I don't really know this part of the perf code enough to give you an ack for the
actual changes, I'll leave that to the perf maintainers.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list