[PATCH 00/31] powerpc/mm: Update page table format for book3s 64
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Tue Sep 22 16:57:33 AEST 2015
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 12:18 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 12:10 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > This patch series attempt to update book3s 64 linux page table format to
> > > make it more flexible. Our current pte format is very restrictive and we
> > > overload multiple pte bits. This is due to the non-availability of free
> > > bits
> > > in pte_t. We use pte_t to track the validity of 4K subpages. This patch
> > > series free up pte_t of 11 bits by moving 4K subpage tracking to the
> > > lower half of PTE page. The pte format is updated such that we have a
> > > better method for identifying a pte entry at pmd level. This will also
> > > enable
> > > us to implement hugetlb migration(not yet done in this series).
> > >
> > > Before making the changes to the pte format, I am splitting the
> > > pte header definition such that we now have the below layout for headers
> > >
> > > book3s
> > > 32
> > > hash.h pgtable.h
> > > 64
> > > hash.h pgtable.h hash-4k.h hash-64k.h
> > > booke
> > > 32
> > > pgtable.h pte-40x.h pte-44x.h pte-8xx.h pte-fsl-booke.h
> > > 64
> > > pgtable-4k.h pgtable-64k.h pgtable.h
> >
> > 40x and 8xx are not booke. Is there a better name that can be used for
> > this
> > directory? Maybe "nohash", similar to arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_nohash.c?
> >
>
> I looked at Documentation/powerpc/cpu_families.txt to name the headers.
> It lists then below booke.
It lists 40x as booke (there was some question about that when
cpu_families.txt was added... I guess you could call it "proto-booke",
though it doesn't use CONFIG_BOOKE in Linux), but 8xx is in its own category.
In any case, "nohash" is the term used elsewhere.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list