[PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs
Gavin Shan
gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Sep 9 13:52:32 AEST 2015
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:36:16AM +0800, Richard Yang wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>Hi, Michael
>>>
>>>Hope you didn't take this yet. We may change this patch a little.
>>>
>>
>>[Cc Alexey who might concern the SRIOV status]
>>
>>Richard, do you have plan to get it upstream? It seems it's hanged
>>over here for long time.
>>
>
>The VF EEH is hung since we re-designed the SRIOV. After the re-design, we
>don't have VF groups.
>
How can this SRIOV redesign patchset affect EEH part greatly? The EEH
VF patchset already support VF PE which contains only one VF.
>My plan is to push the VF EEH patch set after the SRIOV Redesign is accepted.
>
That SRIOV redesign patchset missed 4.3 merge window obviously. I think the
code has been reviewed by Alexey and me. If Alexey isn't going to have more
comments about it, you can refresh the series (EEH support for VF) based on
it and send the updated series. I don't think there is any dependencies.
>>>On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:02:41PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>>When VF BAR size is larger than 64MB, we group VFs in terms of M64 BAR,
>>>>which means those VFs in a group should form a compound PE.
>>>>
>>>>This patch links those VF PEs into compound PE in this case.
>>>>
>>>>[gwshan: code refactoring for a bit]
>>>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>---
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 17 +++++++++--
>>>> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>index 5738d31..d1530cb 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>@@ -1359,9 +1359,20 @@ static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(pe, pe_n, &phb->ioda.pe_list, list) {
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *s, *sn;
>>>> if (pe->parent_dev != pdev)
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>>+ if ((pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER) &&
>>>>+ (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_VF)) {
>>>>+ list_for_each_entry_safe(s, sn, &pe->slaves, list) {
>>>>+ pnv_pci_ioda2_release_dma_pe(pdev, s);
>>>>+ list_del(&s->list);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(phb, s);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, s->pe_number);
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>> pnv_pci_ioda2_release_dma_pe(pdev, pe);
>>>>
>>>> /* Remove from list */
>>>>@@ -1414,7 +1425,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> struct pci_bus *bus;
>>>> struct pci_controller *hose;
>>>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, *master_pe;
>>>> int pe_num;
>>>> u16 vf_index;
>>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>>@@ -1456,10 +1467,13 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> continue;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>- /* Put PE to the list */
>>>>- mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
>>>>- list_add_tail(&pe->list, &phb->ioda.pe_list);
>>>>- mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
>>>>+ /* Put PE to the list, or postpone it for compound PEs */
>>>>+ if ((pdn->m64_per_iov != M64_PER_IOV) ||
>>>>+ (num_vfs <= M64_PER_IOV)) {
>>>>+ mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
>>>>+ list_add_tail(&pe->list, &phb->ioda.pe_list);
>>>>+ mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
>>>>+ }
>>>>
>>>> pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
>>>> }
>>>>@@ -1472,10 +1486,32 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> vf_per_group = roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
>>>>
>>>> for (vf_group = 0; vf_group < M64_PER_IOV; vf_group++) {
>>>>+ master_pe = NULL;
>>>>+
>>>> for (vf_index = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>> vf_index < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>> vf_index < num_vfs;
>>>> vf_index++) {
>>>>+
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * Figure out the master PE and put all slave
>>>>+ * PEs to master PE's list.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pdn->offset + vf_index];
>>>>+ if (!master_pe) {
>>>>+ pe->flags |= PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER;
>>>>+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pe->slaves);
>>>>+ master_pe = pe;
>>>>+ mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
>>>>+ list_add_tail(&pe->list, &phb->ioda.pe_list);
>>>>+ mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
>>>>+ } else {
>>>>+ pe->flags |= PNV_IODA_PE_SLAVE;
>>>>+ pe->master = master_pe;
>>>>+ list_add_tail(&pe->list,
>>>>+ &master_pe->slaves);
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>> for (vf_index1 = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>> vf_index1 < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>> vf_index1 < num_vfs;
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c
>>>>index 0e4f42e..f3aead0 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c
>>>>@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ void pnv_pci_dma_dev_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>>>> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, *slave;
>>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>>
>>>> /* Fix the VF pdn PE number */
>>>>@@ -751,10 +751,23 @@ void pnv_pci_dma_dev_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> (pdev->devfn & 0xff))) {
>>>> pdn->pe_number = pe->pe_number;
>>>> pe->pdev = pdev;
>>>>- break;
>>>>+ goto found;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ if ((pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER) &&
>>>>+ (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_VF)) {
>>>>+ list_for_each_entry(slave, &pe->slaves, list) {
>>>>+ if (slave->rid == ((pdev->bus->number << 8)
>>>>+ | (pdev->devfn & 0xff))) {
>>>>+ pdn->pe_number = slave->pe_number;
>>>>+ slave->pdev = pdev;
>>>>+ goto found;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ }
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>+found:
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>>
>>>> if (phb && phb->dma_dev_setup)
>>>>--
>>>>1.7.9.5
>>>
>>>--
>>>Richard Yang
>>>Help you, Help me
>
>--
>Richard Yang
>Help you, Help me
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list