[RFC 3/5] powerpc: atomic: implement atomic{, 64}_{add, sub}_return_* variants
Pranith Kumar
bobby.prani at gmail.com
Thu Sep 3 01:36:09 AEST 2015
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On 09/02/2015 05:59 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> I just thought it was worth making this point, because it is prohibited
>> in SC and I don't want people to think that our RELEASE/ACQUIRE operations
>> are SC (even though they happen to be on arm64).
>
> This is interesting information. Does that mean that the following patch
> should work? (I am not proposing to use it, just trying to understand if
> REL+ACQ will act as a full barrier on ARM64, which you say it does).
>
> Thanks,
> Pranith.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index d8c25b7..14a1b35 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -68,8 +68,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
> BUILD_BUG();
> }
>
> - smp_mb();
> - return ret;
> + return smp_load_acquire(ret);
I meant 'smp_load_acquire(&ret);'
--
Pranith
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list