[PATCH V10 05/12] powerpc/eeh: Cache only BARs, not windows or IOV BARs
Wei Yang
weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Oct 30 17:37:13 AEDT 2015
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:22:43PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 10/26/2015 02:15 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>>EEH address cache, which helps to locate the PCI device according to
>>the given (physical) MMIO address, didn't cover PCI bridges. Also, it
>>shouldn't return PF
>
>"it shouldn't return" is about the cache, right? eeh_addr_cache_get_dev() -
>this guy can "return", the cache cannot.
>
Here I want to say if we cache the PF's IOV BAR, eeh_addr_cache_get_dev()
would return PF when the address is for VF.
>>with address in PF's IOV BARs. Instead, the VFs
>>should be returned.
>>
>>Also, by doing so, it removes the type check in
>>eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev(), since bridge's window would not be cached.
>>
>>The patch restricts the address cache to cover first 7 BARs for the
>>above purposes.
>
>
>I'd better understand something like this :)
>
>This restricts the EEH address cache to use only first 7 BARs. This makes
>__eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev() ignore PCI bridge windows and IOV BARs. As the
>result of this change, eeh_addr_cache_get_dev() will return VFs from VF's
>resource addresses instead of parent PFs.
>
>This removes extra check for a PCI bridge as we limit
>__eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev() to 7 BARs and this effectively excludes PCI
>bridges from being cached.
>
Yep, I think this one is more clear. Would use this one.
>
>>
>>[gwshan: changelog]
>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c | 6 +-----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
>>index a1e86e1..e6887f0 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
>>@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void __eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> }
>>
>> /* Walk resources on this device, poke them into the tree */
>>- for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
>>+ for (i = 0; i <= PCI_ROM_RESOURCE; i++) {
>> resource_size_t start = pci_resource_start(dev,i);
>> resource_size_t end = pci_resource_end(dev,i);
>> unsigned long flags = pci_resource_flags(dev,i);
>>@@ -222,10 +222,6 @@ void eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>>- /* Ignore PCI bridges */
>>- if ((dev->class >> 16) == PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE)
>>- return;
>>-
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock, flags);
>> __eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev(dev);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.piar_lock, flags);
>>
>
>
>--
>Alexey
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list