[PATCH V10 10/12] powerpc/eeh: Support error recovery for VF PE

Alexey Kardashevskiy aik at ozlabs.ru
Fri Oct 30 16:20:48 AEDT 2015


On 10/26/2015 02:16 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Different from PCI bus dependent PE, PE for VFs doesn't have the

s/Different from/Unlike/


> primary bus, on which the PCI hotplug is implemented. The patch
> supports error recovery, especially the PCI hotplug for VF's PE.

The patch adds support for error recovery of what exactly?
What is "especially" about?


> The hotplug on VF's PE is implemented based on VFs, instead of
> PCI bus any more.

Needs rephrase.

Is this patch about EEH error recovery, i.e. unplug VF, re-plug VF? Why 
does the commit log talk about PE hotplug? I thought we do VF (i.e. PCI 
device) hotplug, not PE.


>
> [gwshan: changelog and code refactoring]
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h   |   1 +
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c        |   8 ++++
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c     |   3 +-
>   4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> index 331c856..ea1f13c4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ struct eeh_dev {
>   	struct pci_controller *phb;	/* Associated PHB		*/
>   	struct pci_dn *pdn;		/* Associated PCI device node	*/
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev;		/* Associated PCI device	*/
> +	int    in_error;		/* Error flag for eeh_dev	*/

Make it "bool".


>   	struct pci_dev *physfn;		/* Associated PF PORT		*/
>   	struct pci_bus *bus;		/* PCI bus for partial hotplug	*/
>   };
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> index af9b597..28e4d73 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> @@ -1227,6 +1227,14 @@ void eeh_remove_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   	 * from the parent PE during the BAR resotre.
>   	 */
>   	edev->pdev = NULL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The flag "in_error" is used to trace EEH devices for VFs
> +	 * in error state or not. It's set in eeh_report_error(). If
> +	 * it's not set, eeh_report_{reset,resume}() won't be called
> +	 * for the VF EEH device.
> +	 */
> +	edev->in_error = 0;
>   	dev->dev.archdata.edev = NULL;
>   	if (!(edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP))
>   		eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> index 89eb4bc..99868e2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static void *eeh_report_error(void *data, void *userdata)
>   	if (rc == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) *res = rc;
>   	if (*res == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE) *res = rc;
>
> +	edev->in_error = 1;
>   	eeh_pcid_put(dev);
>   	return NULL;
>   }
> @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ static void *eeh_report_reset(void *data, void *userdata)
>
>   	if (!driver->err_handler ||
>   	    !driver->err_handler->slot_reset ||
> -	    (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)) {
> +	    (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER) ||
> +	    (!edev->in_error)) {
>   		eeh_pcid_put(dev);
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
> @@ -339,14 +341,16 @@ static void *eeh_report_resume(void *data, void *userdata)
>

bood was_in_error = edev->in_error;
edev->in_error = false;

then use was_in_error below and there is no need to replace return with 
goto, etc -> slightly simpler code.


>   	if (!driver->err_handler ||
>   	    !driver->err_handler->resume ||
> -	    (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)) {
> +	    (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER) ||
> +	    (!edev->in_error)) {
>   		edev->mode &= ~EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER;
> -		eeh_pcid_put(dev);
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto out;
>   	}
>
>   	driver->err_handler->resume(dev);
>
> +out:
> +	edev->in_error = 0;
>   	eeh_pcid_put(dev);
>   	return NULL;
>   }
> @@ -386,12 +390,38 @@ static void *eeh_report_failure(void *data, void *userdata)
>   	return NULL;
>   }
>
> +static void *eeh_add_virt_device(void *data, void *userdata)
> +{
> +	struct pci_driver *driver;
> +	struct eeh_dev *edev = (struct eeh_dev *)data;
> +	struct pci_dev *dev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev);
> +	struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
> +
> +	if (!(edev->physfn)) {
> +		pr_warn("%s: EEH dev %04x:%02x:%02x.%01x not for VF\n",
> +			__func__, edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
> +			PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	driver = eeh_pcid_get(dev);
> +	if (driver) {
> +		eeh_pcid_put(dev);
> +		if (driver->err_handler)
> +			return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	pci_iov_virtfn_add(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index, 0);
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>   static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata)
>   {
>   	struct pci_driver *driver;
>   	struct eeh_dev *edev = (struct eeh_dev *)data;
>   	struct pci_dev *dev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev);
>   	int *removed = (int *)userdata;
> +	struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
>
>   	/*
>   	 * Actually, we should remove the PCI bridges as well.
> @@ -416,7 +446,7 @@ static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata)
>   	driver = eeh_pcid_get(dev);
>   	if (driver) {
>   		eeh_pcid_put(dev);
> -		if (driver->err_handler)
> +		if (removed && driver->err_handler)
>   			return NULL;
>   	}
>
> @@ -425,11 +455,23 @@ static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata)
>   		 pci_name(dev));
>   	edev->bus = dev->bus;
>   	edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED;
> -	(*removed)++;
> +	if (removed)
> +		(*removed)++;
>
> -	pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> -	pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
> -	pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> +	if (edev->physfn) {
> +		pci_iov_virtfn_remove(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index, 0);
> +		edev->pdev = NULL;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We have to set the VF PE number to invalid one, which is
> +		 * required to plug the VF successfully.
> +		 */
> +		pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
> +	} else {
> +		pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> +		pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
> +		pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> +	}
>
>   	return NULL;
>   }
> @@ -548,6 +590,7 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus)
>   	struct pci_bus *frozen_bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe);
>   	struct timeval tstamp;
>   	int cnt, rc, removed = 0;
> +	struct eeh_dev *edev;
>
>   	/* pcibios will clear the counter; save the value */
>   	cnt = pe->freeze_count;
> @@ -561,12 +604,15 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus)
>   	 */
>   	eeh_pe_state_mark(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP);
>   	if (bus) {
> -		pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> -		pcibios_remove_pci_devices(bus);
> -		pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> -	} else if (frozen_bus) {
> +		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF)
> +			eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, NULL);


I believe the rule is that if one branch of "if" uses curly braces, then 
the other should have them too.


> +		else {
> +			pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> +			pcibios_remove_pci_devices(bus);
> +			pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> +		}
> +	} else if (frozen_bus)
>   		eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, &removed);
> -	}
>
>   	/*
>   	 * Reset the pci controller. (Asserts RST#; resets config space).
> @@ -607,14 +653,22 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus)
>   		 * PE. We should disconnect it so the binding can be
>   		 * rebuilt when adding PCI devices.
>   		 */
> +		edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list);
>   		eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL);
> -		pcibios_add_pci_devices(bus);
> +		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF)

Move "edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list)" here. You 
could actually do:

eeh_add_virt_device(list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list), NULL);

and drop local variable @edev. Or move it to this scope. Dunno.


> +			eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL);
> +		else
> +			pcibios_add_pci_devices(bus);
>   	} else if (frozen_bus && removed) {
>   		pr_info("EEH: Sleep 5s ahead of partial hotplug\n");
>   		ssleep(5);
>
> +		edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list);
>   		eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL);
> -		pcibios_add_pci_devices(frozen_bus);
> +		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF)


The same comment as above.

> +			eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL);
> +		else
> +			pcibios_add_pci_devices(frozen_bus);
>   	}
>   	eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP);
>
> @@ -792,11 +846,15 @@ perm_error:
>   	 * the their PCI config any more.
>   	 */
>   	if (frozen_bus) {
> -		eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED);
> -
> -		pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> -		pcibios_remove_pci_devices(frozen_bus);
> -		pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> +		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) {
> +			eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, NULL);
> +			eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED);
> +		} else {
> +			eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED);
> +			pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> +			pcibios_remove_pci_devices(frozen_bus);
> +			pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> +		}
>   	}
>   }
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
> index 260a701..5cde950 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,8 @@ struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe)
>   	if (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB) {
>   		bus = pe->phb->bus;
>   	} else if (pe->type & EEH_PE_BUS ||
> -		   pe->type & EEH_PE_DEVICE) {
> +		   pe->type & EEH_PE_DEVICE ||
> +		   pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) {
>   		if (pe->bus) {
>   			bus = pe->bus;
>   			goto out;
>


-- 
Alexey


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list