[PATCH V10 03/12] powerpc/pci: Cache VF index in pci_dn
Wei Yang
weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Oct 28 12:45:23 AEDT 2015
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 09:04:34AM +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> index b3a226b..3d7e537 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ struct pci_dn {
>> #define IODA_INVALID_PE (-1)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
>> int pe_number;
>> + int vf_index; /* VF index in the PF */
>
>Here, vf_index is inside CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV...
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
>> u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>> index b3b4df9..f771130 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_get_pdn(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent,
>> struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> + int vf_index,
>> int busno, int devfn)
>> {
>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>> @@ -157,6 +158,7 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent,
>> pdn->parent = parent;
>> pdn->busno = busno;
>> pdn->devfn = devfn;
>> + pdn->vf_index = vf_index;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
>> pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>... but here, vf_index is outside CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV.
>
Hey, Daniel
Glad to see you comment. You are right, to be consistent this should be put
into the CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV. Will change it next version.
>Otherwise, the patch looks fine to me.
>
>I'm still trying to get my head around SR-IOV generally - once I do I
>will add any more comments I have or add a reviewed-by.
>
>Regards,
>Daniel
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list