[PATCH V5 3/6] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR
Gavin Shan
gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Oct 13 14:32:49 AEDT 2015
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:50:42AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:55:27AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:46:53AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>In current implementation, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB, it uses 4 M64
>>>BARs in Single PE mode to cover the number of VFs required to be enabled.
>>>By doing so, several VFs would be in one VF Group and leads to interference
>>>between VFs in the same group.
>>>
>>>And in this patch, m64_wins is renamed to m64_map, which means index number
>>>of the M64 BAR used to map the VF BAR. Based on Gavin's comments.
>>>
>>>This patch changes the design by using one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for
>>>one VF BAR. This gives absolute isolation for VFs.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
>>>---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 5 +-
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 169 ++++++++++++------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>index 712add5..8aeba4c 100644
>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>@@ -214,10 +214,9 @@ struct pci_dn {
>>> u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
>>> u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
>>> int offset; /* PE# for the first VF PE */
>>>-#define M64_PER_IOV 4
>>>- int m64_per_iov;
>>>+ bool m64_single_mode; /* Use M64 BAR in Single Mode */
>>> #define IODA_INVALID_M64 (-1)
>>>- int m64_wins[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS][M64_PER_IOV];
>>>+ int (*m64_map)[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>> #endif
>>> struct list_head child_list;
>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>index 7da476b..2886f90 100644
>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>@@ -1148,29 +1148,36 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs(void)
>>> }
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>-static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>+static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_bus *bus;
>>> struct pci_controller *hose;
>>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>> int i, j;
>>>+ int m64_bars;
>>>
>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>> phb = hose->private_data;
>>> pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>+ m64_bars = num_vfs;
>>>+ else
>>>+ m64_bars = 1;
>>>+
>>> for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++)
>>>- for (j = 0; j < M64_PER_IOV; j++) {
>>>- if (pdn->m64_wins[i][j] == IODA_INVALID_M64)
>>>+ for (j = 0; j < m64_bars; j++) {
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_map[j][i] == IODA_INVALID_M64)
>>> continue;
>>> opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 0);
>>>- clear_bit(pdn->m64_wins[i][j], &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc);
>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 0);
>>>+ clear_bit(pdn->m64_map[j][i], &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc);
>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>> }
>>>
>>>+ kfree(pdn->m64_map);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>>@@ -1187,8 +1194,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> int total_vfs;
>>> resource_size_t size, start;
>>> int pe_num;
>>>- int vf_groups;
>>>- int vf_per_group;
>>>+ int m64_bars;
>>>
>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>@@ -1196,26 +1202,26 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>> total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
>>>
>>>- /* Initialize the m64_wins to IODA_INVALID_M64 */
>>>- for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++)
>>>- for (j = 0; j < M64_PER_IOV; j++)
>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>+ m64_bars = num_vfs;
>>>+ else
>>>+ m64_bars = 1;
>>>+
>>>+ pdn->m64_map = kmalloc(sizeof(*pdn->m64_map) * m64_bars, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>+ if (!pdn->m64_map)
>>>+ return -ENOMEM;
>>>+ /* Initialize the m64_map to IODA_INVALID_M64 */
>>>+ for (i = 0; i < m64_bars ; i++)
>>>+ for (j = 0; j < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; j++)
>>>+ pdn->m64_map[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>>
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>- vf_groups = (num_vfs <= M64_PER_IOV) ? num_vfs: M64_PER_IOV;
>>>- vf_per_group = (num_vfs <= M64_PER_IOV)? 1:
>>>- roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
>>>- } else {
>>>- vf_groups = 1;
>>>- vf_per_group = 1;
>>>- }
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>>> res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
>>> if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
>>> continue;
>>>
>>>- for (j = 0; j < vf_groups; j++) {
>>>+ for (j = 0; j < m64_bars; j++) {
>>> do {
>>> win = find_next_zero_bit(&phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc,
>>> phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx + 1, 0);
>>>@@ -1224,12 +1230,11 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> goto m64_failed;
>>> } while (test_and_set_bit(win, &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc));
>>>
>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = win;
>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i] = win;
>>>
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>>> size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev,
>>> PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i);
>>>- size = size * vf_per_group;
>>> start = res->start + size * j;
>>> } else {
>>> size = resource_size(res);
>>>@@ -1237,16 +1242,16 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Map the M64 here */
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>>> pe_num = pdn->offset + j;
>>> rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
>>> pe_num, OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 0);
>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i], 0);
>>> }
>>>
>>> rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id,
>>> OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j],
>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i],
>>> start,
>>> 0, /* unused */
>>> size);
>>>@@ -1258,12 +1263,12 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> goto m64_failed;
>>> }
>>>
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV)
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>> rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 2);
>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 2);
>>> else
>>> rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 1);
>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 1);
>>>
>>> if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable M64 window #%d: %llx\n",
>>>@@ -1275,7 +1280,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> m64_failed:
>>>- pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev);
>>>+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
>>> return -EBUSY;
>>> }
>>>
>>>@@ -1302,15 +1307,13 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda2_release_dma_pe(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pnv_ioda_pe
>>> iommu_free_table(tbl, of_node_full_name(dev->dev.of_node));
>>> }
>>>
>>>-static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>+static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_bus *bus;
>>> struct pci_controller *hose;
>>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>> struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, *pe_n;
>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>- u16 vf_index;
>>>- int64_t rc;
>>>
>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>@@ -1320,35 +1323,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> if (!pdev->is_physfn)
>>> return;
>>>
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV && num_vfs > M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>- int vf_group;
>>>- int vf_per_group;
>>>- int vf_index1;
>>>-
>>>- vf_per_group = roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
>>>-
>>>- for (vf_group = 0; vf_group < M64_PER_IOV; vf_group++)
>>>- for (vf_index = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>- vf_index < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>- vf_index < num_vfs;
>>>- vf_index++)
>>>- for (vf_index1 = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>- vf_index1 < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>- vf_index1 < num_vfs;
>>>- vf_index1++){
>>>-
>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id,
>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index,
>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1,
>>>- OPAL_REMOVE_PE_FROM_DOMAIN);
>>>-
>>>- if (rc)
>>>- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Failed to unlink same group PE#%d(%lld)\n",
>>>- __func__,
>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1, rc);
>>>- }
>>>- }
>>>-
>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(pe, pe_n, &phb->ioda.pe_list, list) {
>>> if (pe->parent_dev != pdev)
>>> continue;
>>>@@ -1383,14 +1357,14 @@ void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> num_vfs = pdn->num_vfs;
>>>
>>> /* Release VF PEs */
>>>- pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>+ pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev);
>>>
>>> if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == 1)
>>>+ if (!pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>> pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -pdn->offset);
>>>
>>> /* Release M64 windows */
>>>- pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev);
>>>+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>
>>> /* Release PE numbers */
>>> bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, pdn->offset, num_vfs);
>>>@@ -1409,7 +1383,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> int pe_num;
>>> u16 vf_index;
>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>- int64_t rc;
>>>
>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>@@ -1454,37 +1427,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>
>>> pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
>>> }
>>>-
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV && num_vfs > M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>- int vf_group;
>>>- int vf_per_group;
>>>- int vf_index1;
>>>-
>>>- vf_per_group = roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
>>>-
>>>- for (vf_group = 0; vf_group < M64_PER_IOV; vf_group++) {
>>>- for (vf_index = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>- vf_index < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>- vf_index < num_vfs;
>>>- vf_index++) {
>>>- for (vf_index1 = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>- vf_index1 < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>- vf_index1 < num_vfs;
>>>- vf_index1++) {
>>>-
>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id,
>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index,
>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1,
>>>- OPAL_ADD_PE_TO_DOMAIN);
>>>-
>>>- if (rc)
>>>- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Failed to link same group PE#%d(%lld)\n",
>>>- __func__,
>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1, rc);
>>>- }
>>>- }
>>>- }
>>>- }
>>> }
>>>
>>> int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>@@ -1507,6 +1449,15 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> return -ENOSPC;
>>> }
>>>
>>>+ /*
>>>+ * When M64 BARs functions in Single PE mode, the number of VFs
>>>+ * could be enabled must be less than the number of M64 BARs.
>>>+ */
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode && num_vfs > phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx) {
>>>+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Not enough M64 BAR for VFs\n");
>>>+ return -EBUSY;
>>>+ }
>>>+
>>> /* Calculate available PE for required VFs */
>>> mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
>>> pdn->offset = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(
>>>@@ -1534,7 +1485,7 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> * the IOV BAR according to the PE# allocated to the VFs.
>>> * Otherwise, the PE# for the VF will conflict with others.
>>> */
>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == 1) {
>>>+ if (!pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>>> ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, pdn->offset);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto m64_failed;
>>>@@ -1567,8 +1518,7 @@ int pcibios_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>> /* Allocate PCI data */
>>> add_dev_pci_data(pdev);
>>>
>>>- pnv_pci_sriov_enable(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>- return 0;
>>>+ return pnv_pci_sriov_enable(pdev, num_vfs);
>>> }
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>
>>>@@ -2762,9 +2712,9 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>
>>> pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>> pdn->vfs_expanded = 0;
>>>+ pdn->m64_single_mode = false;
>>>
>>> total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
>>>- pdn->m64_per_iov = 1;
>>> mul = phb->ioda.total_pe;
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>>>@@ -2784,8 +2734,8 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> if (size > (1 << 26)) {
>>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR%d: %pR IOV size is bigger than 64M, roundup power2\n",
>>> i, res);
>>>- pdn->m64_per_iov = M64_PER_IOV;
>>> mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs);
>>>+ pdn->m64_single_mode = true;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>@@ -2987,6 +2937,8 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_window_alignment(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>> static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>> int resno)
>>> {
>>>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>> struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>> resource_size_t align;
>>>
>>>@@ -2995,12 +2947,23 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>> * SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64
>>> * BAR should be size aligned.
>>> *
>>>+ * When IOV BAR is mapped with M64 BAR in Single PE mode, the extra
>>>+ * powernv-specific hardware restriction is gone. But if just use the
>>>+ * VF BAR size as the alignment, PF BAR / VF BAR may be allocated with
>>>+ * in one segment of M64 #15, which introduces the PE conflict between
>>>+ * PF and VF. Based on this, the minimum alignment of an IOV BAR is
>>>+ * m64_segsize.
>>>+ *
>>
>>When M64 BARs run in single mode, it still requires 32MB aligned. Does
>>"the extra powernv-specific hardware restriction" includes the limitation
>>or not?
>>
>
>The 32MB aligned you mentioned is the size of VF BAR?
>
>The answer is No. "the extra powernv-specific hardware restriction" only
>mentioned the total M64 BAR alignment.
>
No, it's PHB's M64 BAR. there are 16 in total. When it's running in single PE
mode, it requires 32MB alignment at least. Extracted from PHB3 spec:
When Single PE = 1, Bits 02:26 are the base address to compare
against the MSB 25 AIB address bits, 0:24, out of 0:49 (32MB aligned).
Bits 27:31 are the upper 5 bits of the PE# that owns the entire address
space defined by this BAR.
>>> * This function returns the total IOV BAR size if M64 BAR is in
>>> * Shared PE mode or just the individual size if not.
>>>+ * If the M64 BAR is in Single PE mode, return the VF BAR size or
>>>+ * M64 segment size if IOV BAR size is less.
>>> */
>>> align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
>>> if (!pdn->vfs_expanded)
>>> return align;
>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>+ return max(align, (resource_size_t)phb->ioda.m64_segsize);
>>>
>>> return pdn->vfs_expanded * align;
>>> }
>>>--
>>>2.5.0
>>>
>
>--
>Richard Yang
>Help you, Help me
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list