powerpc: Fix _ALIGN_* errors due to type difference.
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Oct 7 19:46:38 AEDT 2015
Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> writes:
> On Fri, 2015-02-10 at 14:33:48 UTC, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
>> This avoid errors like
>>
>> unsigned int usize = 1 << 30;
>> int size = 1 << 30;
>> unsigned long addr = 64UL << 30 ;
>>
>> value = _ALIGN_DOWN(addr, usize); -> 0
>> value = _ALIGN_DOWN(addr, size); -> 0x1000000000
>
> Are you actually seeing that anywhere? I assume not.
I hit that in new development. So not in the current kernel.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/page.h b/arch/powerpc/boot/page.h
>> index 14eca30fef64..87c42d7d283d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/page.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/page.h
>> @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
>> #define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
>>
>> /* align addr on a size boundary - adjust address up/down if needed */
>> -#define _ALIGN_UP(addr,size) (((addr)+((size)-1))&(~((size)-1)))
>> -#define _ALIGN_DOWN(addr,size) ((addr)&(~((size)-1)))
>> +#define _ALIGN_UP(addr, size) (((addr)+((size)-1))&(~((typeof(addr))(size)-1)))
>> +#define _ALIGN_DOWN(addr, size) ((addr)&(~((typeof(addr))(size)-1)))
>>
>> /* align addr on a size boundary - adjust address up if needed */
>> #define _ALIGN(addr,size) _ALIGN_UP(addr,size)
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
>> index 71294a6e976e..1dd69774a31c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
>> @@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ extern long long virt_phys_offset;
>> #endif
>>
>> /* align addr on a size boundary - adjust address up/down if needed */
>> -#define _ALIGN_UP(addr,size) (((addr)+((size)-1))&(~((size)-1)))
>> -#define _ALIGN_DOWN(addr,size) ((addr)&(~((size)-1)))
>> +#define _ALIGN_UP(addr, size) (((addr)+((size)-1))&(~((typeof(addr))(size)-1)))
>> +#define _ALIGN_DOWN(addr, size) ((addr)&(~((typeof(addr))(size)-1)))
>
>
> It looks like ALIGN() in kernel.h already does this right, so can we just use
> that instead for _ALIGN_UP() at least.
>
But we still can't get rid of _ALIGN_UP, because that is used in other
parts of the kernel and if you are suggesting use
#define _ALIGN_UP __ALIGN_KERNEL, IMHO that is unnecessary indirection
for no real benefit.
-aneesh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list