[PATCH v4 19/21] drivers/of: Support adding sub-tree
Pantelis Antoniou
panto at antoniou-consulting.com
Thu May 14 21:02:26 AEST 2015
Hi Ben,
> On May 14, 2015, at 10:47 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
[snip]
So I spend some time thinking about your use case and I think it boils down
to this:
I have a live tree in the firmware, I have made changes and I need to reflect
those changes to the live tree in the kernel.
Sounds like ‘how do I generate a patch for getting those two in sync'. No?
I can see where this might be useful for others as all.
I think we really need to create a liblivedt like we have libfdt since
we have a number of projects going about using/manipulating DT at runtime.
1. The linux kernel, with it’s own live tree implementation.
2. The device tree compiler (it has a live tree) custom implemented.
3. Your weird and wonderful (or wacky) firmware.
4. u-boot does use DT now, but it does with libfdt. I believe this is suboptimal.
5. barebox does DT as well.
Most of what we want to do with DT can be abstracted in a library I think that
all of those projects can use.
What are your thoughts?
Regards
— Pantelis
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list