[PATCH v4 07/21] powerpc/powernv: Release PEs dynamically
Gavin Shan
gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue May 12 10:03:08 AEST 2015
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:02:08PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 05/11/2015 04:25 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:43:23PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>On 05/01/2015 04:02 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>>The original code doesn't support releasing PEs dynamically, meaning
>>>>that PE and the associated resources (IO, M32, M64 and DMA) can't
>>>>be released when unplugging a PCI adapter from one hotpluggable slot.
>>>>
>>>>The patch takes object oriented methodology, introducs reference
>>>>count to PE, which is initialized to 1 and increased with 1 when a
>>>>new PCI device joins the PE. Once the last PCI device leaves the
>>>>PE, the PE is going to be release together with its associated
>>>>(IO, M32, M64, DMA) resources.
>>>
>>>
>>>Too little commit log for non-trivial non-cut-n-paste 30KB patch...
>>>
>>
>>Ok. I'll add more details in next revision.
>>
>>>>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>---
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 3 +
>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c | 5 +
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 658 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 4 +-
>>>> 4 files changed, 432 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>index 5367eb3..a6ad4b1 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>@@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ struct pci_controller_ops {
>>>> resource_size_t (*window_alignment)(struct pci_bus *, unsigned long type);
>>>> void (*setup_bridge)(struct pci_bus *, unsigned long);
>>>> void (*reset_secondary_bus)(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Called when PCI device is released */
>>>>+ void (*release_device)(struct pci_dev *);
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
>>>>index 7ed85a6..0040343 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
>>>>@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
>>>> */
>>>> void pcibios_release_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> {
>>>>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (hose->controller_ops.release_device)
>>>>+ hose->controller_ops.release_device(dev);
>>>>+
>>>> eeh_remove_device(dev);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>index 910fb67..ef8c216 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>>>> #undef DEBUG
>>>>
>>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>>+#include <linux/atomic.h>
>>>>+#include <linux/kref.h>
>>>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>>>> #include <linux/crash_dump.h>
>>>> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>>>>@@ -47,6 +49,8 @@
>>>> /* 256M DMA window, 4K TCE pages, 8 bytes TCE */
>>>> #define TCE32_TABLE_SIZE ((0x10000000 / 0x1000) * 8)
>>>>
>>>>+static void pnv_ioda_release_pe(struct kref *kref);
>>>>+
>>>> static void pe_level_printk(const struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, const char *level,
>>>> const char *fmt, ...)
>>>> {
>>>>@@ -123,25 +127,400 @@ static inline bool pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(unsigned long flags)
>>>> (IORESOURCE_MEM_64 | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH));
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>-static void pnv_ioda_reserve_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no)
>>>>+static inline void pnv_ioda_pe_get(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>> {
>>>>- if (!(pe_no >= 0 && pe_no < phb->ioda.total_pe)) {
>>>>- pr_warn("%s: Invalid PE %d on PHB#%x\n",
>>>>- __func__, pe_no, phb->hose->global_number);
>>>>+ if (!pe)
>>>>+ return;
>>>>+
>>>>+ kref_get(&pe->kref);
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static inline void pnv_ioda_pe_put(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ unsigned int count;
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (!pe)
>>>> return;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * The count is initialized to 1 and increased with 1 when
>>>>+ * a new PCI device is bound with the PE. Once the last PCI
>>>>+ * device is leaving from the PE, the PE is going to be
>>>>+ * released.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ count = atomic_read(&pe->kref.refcount);
>>>>+ if (count == 2)
>>>>+ kref_sub(&pe->kref, 2, pnv_ioda_release_pe);
>>>>+ else
>>>>+ kref_put(&pe->kref, pnv_ioda_release_pe);
>>>
>>>
>>>What if pnv_ioda_pe_get() gets called between atomic_read() and kref_sub()?
>>>
>>
>>Yeah, that would have problem. But it shouldn't happen because the
>>PCI devices are joining the parent PE# in strictly serialized mode.
>>Same thing happens when detaching PCI devices from its parent PE.
>
>
>oookay. Another thing then - why is this kref counter initialized to 1?
>It would make sense if you did something special when the counter becomes 1
>after decrement but you do not.
>
>Also, this kref thing makes sense if you do kref_put() in multiple places and
>do not know which one will be the last one so you pass the callback to all of
>them. Here you do kref_put/sub in one place and you read the counter - so you
>can call pnv_ioda_release_pe() directly. And it feels like a simple atomic_t
>would do the job just fine. If you still feel that the counter should start
>from 1, there are atomic_dec_if_positive() and atomic_inc_not_zero() and
>others.
>
It's good question actually. The counter is initialized to 1 when the PE
is reserved because of M64 requirement or allocated for non-M64 case. If
we reserve or allocate PE#, there is one thing for sure: the PCI bus has
one PCI device (including PCI bridge) at least. After the PE# is reserved
or allocated, the PCI device joins the PE with the result of increasing
the counter with 1. It means the counter is 2 when PE contains one PCI
device, and 3 when there're 2 devices. One reason for this design is that
we just need decrease the counter if we have to release this PE in the
window between PE reservation/allocation and first PCI device joins. I
think you're correct that we can call pnv_ioda_release_pe() in this window.
In this way, the counter is always reflecting the number of PCI devices
the PE contains.
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static void pnv_pci_release_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>>>+ struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (pdn && pdn->pe_number != IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>>>+ pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pdn->pe_number];
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_pe_put(pe);
>>>>+ pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>> }
>>>>+}
>>>>
>>>>- if (test_and_set_bit(pe_no, phb->ioda.pe_alloc)) {
>>>>- pr_warn("%s: PE %d was assigned on PHB#%x\n",
>>>>- __func__, pe_no, phb->hose->global_number);
>>>>+static void pnv_ioda_release_pe_dma(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb;
>>>>+ int index, count;
>>>>+ unsigned long tbl_addr, tbl_size;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* No DMA capability for slave PEs */
>>>>+ if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_SLAVE)
>>>>+ return;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Bypass DMA window */
>>>>+ if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA2 &&
>>>>+ pe->tce_bypass_enabled &&
>>>>+ pe->tce32_table &&
>>>>+ pe->tce32_table->set_bypass)
>>>>+ pe->tce32_table->set_bypass(pe->tce32_table, false);
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* 32-bits DMA window */
>>>>+ count = pe->tce32_seg_end - pe->tce32_seg_start;
>>>>+ tbl_addr = pe->tce32_table->it_base;
>>>>+ if (!count)
>>>> return;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Free IOMMU table */
>>>>+ iommu_free_table(pe->tce32_table,
>>>>+ of_node_full_name(phb->hose->dn));
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Deconfigure TCE table */
>>>>+ switch (phb->type) {
>>>>+ case PNV_PHB_IODA1:
>>>>+ for (index = 0; index < count; index++)
>>>>+ opal_pci_map_pe_dma_window(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ pe->pe_number,
>>>>+ pe->tce32_seg_start + index,
>>>>+ 1,
>>>>+ __pa(tbl_addr) +
>>>>+ index * TCE32_TABLE_SIZE,
>>>>+ 0,
>>>>+ 0x1000);
>>>>+ bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.tce32_segmap,
>>>>+ pe->tce32_seg_start,
>>>>+ count);
>>>>+ tbl_size = TCE32_TABLE_SIZE * count;
>>>>+ break;
>>>>+ case PNV_PHB_IODA2:
>>>>+ opal_pci_map_pe_dma_window(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ pe->pe_number,
>>>>+ pe->pe_number << 1,
>>>>+ 1,
>>>>+ __pa(tbl_addr),
>>>>+ 0,
>>>>+ 0x1000);
>>>>+ tbl_size = (1ul << ilog2(phb->ioda.m32_pci_base));
>>>>+ tbl_size = (tbl_size >> IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT_4K) * 8;
>>>>+ break;
>>>>+ default:
>>>>+ pe_warn(pe, "Unsupported PHB type %d\n", phb->type);
>>>>+ return;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Free memory of IOMMU table */
>>>>+ free_pages(tbl_addr, get_order(tbl_size));
>>>
>>>
>>>You just programmed the table address to TVT and then you are releasing the
>>>pages. It does not seem right, it will leave garbage in TVT. Also, I am
>>>adding helpers to alloc/free TCE pages in DDW patchset, you could reuse bits
>>>from there (I'll post v10 soon, you'll be in copy and you'll have to review
>>>that ;) ).
>>>
>>
>>I assume you're talking about TVE. I don't understand how garbage will be left
>>in TVE. opal_pci_map_pe_dma_window(), which is handled by skiboot, clear TVE
>>with zero'ed "tce_table_size". The pages previously allocated for TCE table is
>>released to buddy system, which can be allocated by somebody else (from buddy
>>or slab).
>
>opal_pci_map_pe_dma_window() takes __pa(tbl_addr) which points to some memory
>which is still allocated. This value goes to a table (which has 2 entries per
>PE, one for 32bit DMA window and one for bypass/hugewindow) which PHB uses to
>get the actual TCE table address. What is the name of this table? :) Anyway,
>you write an address there and then you call free_pages() so after
>free_pages(), the value in that TVE/TVT/whatever table is a garbage.
>
I don't look into your DDW code yet. Before we have DDW patchset, the bypass
TVE (window) isn't supposed to have corresponding TCE table. I guess you might
change the behaviour in your DDW patchset and I'll take a close look on that.
For DMA32 window, which is the name of the table, the TVE is cleared by skiboot
when having zero "tce_table_size" argument.
opal_pci_map_pe_dma_window(phb->opal_id,
pe->pe_number,
pe->pe_number << 1,
1,
__pa(tbl_addr),
0, <<<< "tce_table_size".
0x1000);
>
>>
>>Ok. Please put me into the cc list. I guess the whole series of patches is
>>better to rebased on your DDW patchset, which is to be merged first, I believe.
>>
>>>
>>>>+ pe->tce32_table = NULL;
>>>>+ pe->tce32_seg_start = 0;
>>>>+ pe->tce32_seg_end = 0;
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static void pnv_ioda_release_pe_seg(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb;
>>>>+ unsigned long *segmap = NULL, *pe_segmap = NULL;
>>>>+ int i;
>>>>+ uint16_t win, win_type[] = { OPAL_IO_WINDOW_TYPE,
>>>>+ OPAL_M32_WINDOW_TYPE,
>>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE };
>>>>+
>>>>+ for (win = 0; win < ARRAY_SIZE(win_type); win++) {
>>>>+ switch (win_type[win]) {
>>>>+ case OPAL_IO_WINDOW_TYPE:
>>>>+ segmap = phb->ioda.io_segmap;
>>>>+ pe_segmap = pe->io_segmap;
>>>>+ break;
>>>>+ case OPAL_M32_WINDOW_TYPE:
>>>>+ segmap = phb->ioda.m32_segmap;
>>>>+ pe_segmap = pe->m32_segmap;
>>>>+ break;
>>>>+ case OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE:
>>>>+ segmap = phb->ioda.m64_segmap;
>>>>+ pe_segmap = pe->m64_segmap;
>>>>+ break;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ i = -1;
>>>>+ while ((i = find_next_bit(pe_segmap,
>>>>+ phb->ioda.total_pe, i + 1)) < phb->ioda.total_pe) {
>>>>+ if (win_type[win] == OPAL_IO_WINDOW_TYPE ||
>>>>+ win_type[win] == OPAL_M32_WINDOW_TYPE)
>>>>+ opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ phb->ioda.reserved_pe,
>>>>+ win_type[win], 0, i);
>>>>+ else if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1)
>>>>+ opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ phb->ioda.reserved_pe,
>>>>+ win_type[win],
>>>>+ i / 8, i % 8);
>>>
>>>The function is called ""release" but it programs something what looks like
>>>reasonable values, is it correct?
>>>
>>
>>It's out of problem, When the segment is deallocated, it's mapped to the
>>reserved PE#.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>+
>>>>+ clear_bit(i, pe_segmap);
>>>>+ clear_bit(i, segmap);
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ }
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static int pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *parent,
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *child,
>>>>+ bool is_add)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ const char *desc = is_add ? "adding" : "removing";
>>>>+ uint8_t op = is_add ? OPAL_ADD_PE_TO_DOMAIN :
>>>>+ OPAL_REMOVE_PE_FROM_DOMAIN;
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *slave;
>>>>+ long rc;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Parent PE affects child PE */
>>>>+ rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id, parent->pe_number,
>>>>+ child->pe_number, op);
>>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>>>+ pe_warn(child, "OPAL error %ld %s to parent PELTV\n",
>>>>+ rc, desc);
>>>>+ return -ENXIO;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (!(child->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER))
>>>>+ return 0;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Compound case: parent PE affects slave PEs */
>>>>+ list_for_each_entry(slave, &child->slaves, list) {
>>>>+ rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id, parent->pe_number,
>>>>+ slave->pe_number, op);
>>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>>>+ pe_warn(slave, "OPAL error %ld %s to parent PELTV\n",
>>>>+ rc, desc);
>>>>+ return -ENXIO;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ return 0;
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static int pnv_ioda_set_peltv(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, bool is_add)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb;
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *slave;
>>>>+ struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>>>>+ int ret;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * Clear PE frozen state. If it's master PE, we need
>>>>+ * clear slave PE frozen state as well.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ opal_pci_eeh_freeze_clear(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ pe->pe_number,
>>>>+ OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
>>>>+ if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER) {
>>>>+ list_for_each_entry(slave, &pe->slaves, list) {
>>>>+ opal_pci_eeh_freeze_clear(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ slave->pe_number,
>>>>+ OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * Associate PE in PELT. We need add the PE into the
>>>>+ * corresponding PELT-V as well. Otherwise, the error
>>>>+ * originated from the PE might contribute to other
>>>>+ * PEs.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ ret = pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(phb, pe, pe, is_add);
>>>>+ if (ret)
>>>>+ return ret;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* For compound PEs, any one affects all of them */
>>>>+ if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER) {
>>>>+ list_for_each_entry(slave, &pe->slaves, list) {
>>>>+ ret = pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(phb, slave, pe, is_add);
>>>>+ if (ret)
>>>>+ return ret;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (pe->flags & (PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL | PNV_IODA_PE_BUS))
>>>>+ pdev = pe->pbus->self;
>>>>+ else if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_DEV)
>>>>+ pdev = pe->pdev->bus->self;
>>>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>>+ else if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_VF)
>>>>+ pdev = pe->parent_dev->bus->self;
>>>>+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>>+
>>>>+ while (pdev) {
>>>>+ struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *parent;
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (pdn && pdn->pe_number != IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>>>+ parent = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pdn->pe_number];
>>>>+ ret = pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(phb, parent, pe, is_add);
>>>>+ if (ret)
>>>>+ return ret;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ pdev = pdev->bus->self;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ return 0;
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static void pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>
>>>
>>>It used to be under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV, now it is not. Looks like just
>>>moving of this function to a different place deserves a separate patch with a
>>>comment why ("it is going to be used now for non-SRIOV case too" may be?).
>>>
>>
>>Yeah, it makes sense to me. Will fix it up.
>>
>>>
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb;
>>>>+ struct pci_dev *parent;
>>>>+ uint8_t bcomp, dcomp, fcomp;
>>>>+ long rid_end, rid;
>>>>+ int64_t rc;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Tear down MVE */
>>>>+ if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1 &&
>>>>+ pe->mve_number != -1) {
>>>>+ rc = opal_pci_set_mve(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ pe->mve_number,
>>>>+ phb->ioda.reserved_pe);
>>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS)
>>>>+ pe_warn(pe, "Error %lld unmapping MVE#%d\n",
>>>>+ rc, pe->mve_number);
>>>>+ rc = opal_pci_set_mve_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ pe->mve_number,
>>>>+ OPAL_DISABLE_MVE);
>>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS)
>>>>+ pe_warn(pe, "Error %lld disabling MVE#%d\n",
>>>>+ rc, pe->mve_number);
>>>>+ pe->mve_number = -1;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Unmapping PELTV */
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_set_peltv(pe, false);
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* To unmap PELTM */
>>>>+ if (pe->pbus) {
>>>>+ int count;
>>>>+
>>>>+ dcomp = OPAL_IGNORE_RID_DEVICE_NUMBER;
>>>>+ fcomp = OPAL_IGNORE_RID_FUNCTION_NUMBER;
>>>>+ parent = pe->pbus->self;
>>>>+ if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL)
>>>>+ count = pe->pbus->busn_res.end -
>>>>+ pe->pbus->busn_res.start + 1;
>>>>+ else
>>>>+ count = 1;
>>>>+
>>>>+ switch(count) {
>>>>+ case 1: bcomp = OpalPciBusAll; break;
>>>>+ case 2: bcomp = OpalPciBus7Bits; break;
>>>>+ case 4: bcomp = OpalPciBus6Bits; break;
>>>>+ case 8: bcomp = OpalPciBus5Bits; break;
>>>>+ case 16: bcomp = OpalPciBus4Bits; break;
>>>>+ case 32: bcomp = OpalPciBus3Bits; break;
>>>>+ default:
>>>>+ /* Fail back to case of one bus */
>>>>+ pe_warn(pe, "Cannot support %d buses\n", count);
>>>>+ bcomp = OpalPciBusAll;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ rid_end = pe->rid + (count << 8);
>>>>+ } else {
>>>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>>+ if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_VF)
>>>>+ parent = pe->parent_dev;
>>>>+ else
>>>>+#endif
>>>>+ parent = pe->pdev->bus->self;
>>>>+ bcomp = OpalPciBusAll;
>>>>+ dcomp = OPAL_COMPARE_RID_DEVICE_NUMBER;
>>>>+ fcomp = OPAL_COMPARE_RID_FUNCTION_NUMBER;
>>>>+ rid_end = pe->rid + 1;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Clear RID mapping */
>>>>+ for (rid = pe->rid; rid < rid_end; rid++)
>>>>+ phb->ioda.pe_rmap[rid] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Unmapping PELTM */
>>>>+ rc = opal_pci_set_pe(phb->opal_id, pe->pe_number, pe->rid,
>>>>+ bcomp, dcomp, fcomp, OPAL_UNMAP_PE);
>>>>+ if (rc)
>>>>+ pe_warn(pe, "Error %ld unmapping PELTM\n", rc);
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static void pnv_ioda_release_pe(struct kref *kref)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = container_of(kref, struct pnv_ioda_pe, kref);
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *tmp, *slave;
>>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb;
>>>>+
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_release_pe_dma(pe);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_release_pe_seg(pe);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(pe);
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Release slave PEs for compound PE */
>>>>+ if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER) {
>>>>+ list_for_each_entry_safe(slave, tmp, &pe->slaves, list)
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_pe_put(slave);
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Remove the PE from various list. We need remove slave
>>>>+ * PE from master's list.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ list_del(&pe->dma_link);
>>>>+ list_del(&pe->list);
>>>>+
>>>>+ /* Free PE number */
>>>>+ clear_bit(pe->pe_number, phb->ioda.pe_alloc);
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_init_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>+ int pe_no)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_no];
>>>>+
>>>>+ kref_init(&pe->kref);
>>>>+ pe->phb = phb;
>>>>+ pe->pe_number = pe_no;
>>>>+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pe->dma_link);
>>>>+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pe->list);
>>>>+
>>>>+ return pe;
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_reserve_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>+ int pe_no)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ if (!(pe_no >= 0 && pe_no < phb->ioda.total_pe)) {
>>>>+ pr_warn("%s: Invalid PE %d on PHB#%x\n",
>>>>+ __func__, pe_no, phb->hose->global_number);
>>>>+ return NULL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>- phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_no].phb = phb;
>>>>- phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_no].pe_number = pe_no;
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * Same PE might be reserved for multiple times, which
>>>>+ * is out of problem actually.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ set_bit(pe_no, phb->ioda.pe_alloc);
>>>>+ return pnv_ioda_init_pe(phb, pe_no);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>-static int pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned long pe_no;
>>>> unsigned long limit = phb->ioda.total_pe - 1;
>>>>@@ -154,20 +533,10 @@ static int pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>>> break;
>>>>
>>>> if (--limit >= phb->ioda.total_pe)
>>>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>>+ return NULL;
>>>> } while(1);
>>>>
>>>>- phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_no].phb = phb;
>>>>- phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_no].pe_number = pe_no;
>>>>- return pe_no;
>>>>-}
>>>>-
>>>>-static void pnv_ioda_free_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe)
>>>>-{
>>>>- WARN_ON(phb->ioda.pe_array[pe].pdev);
>>>>-
>>>>- memset(&phb->ioda.pe_array[pe], 0, sizeof(struct pnv_ioda_pe));
>>>>- clear_bit(pe, phb->ioda.pe_alloc);
>>>>+ return pnv_ioda_init_pe(phb, pe_no);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static int pnv_ioda1_init_m64(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>>>@@ -382,8 +751,9 @@ static void pnv_ioda_reserve_m64_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>-static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>- struct pci_bus *bus, int all)
>>>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>+ struct pci_bus *bus,
>>>>+ int all)
>>>
>>>
>>>Mechanic changes like this could easily go to a separate patch.
>>>
>>
>>Indeed. I'll see how I can split the patches up in next revision.
>>Thanks for the suggestion.
>>
>>>> {
>>>> resource_size_t segsz = phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>>>@@ -394,14 +764,14 @@ static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>> int i;
>>>>
>>>> if (!pnv_ioda_need_m64_pe(phb, bus))
>>>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>>+ return NULL;
>>>>
>>>> /* Allocate bitmap */
>>>> size = _ALIGN_UP(phb->ioda.total_pe / 8, sizeof(unsigned long));
>>>> pe_bitsmap = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (!pe_bitsmap) {
>>>> pr_warn("%s: Out of memory !\n", __func__);
>>>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>>+ return NULL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* The bridge's M64 window might be extended to PHB's M64
>>>>@@ -438,7 +808,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>> /* No M64 window found ? */
>>>> if (bitmap_empty(pe_bitsmap, phb->ioda.total_pe)) {
>>>> kfree(pe_bitsmap);
>>>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>>+ return NULL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Figure out the master PE and put all slave PEs
>>>>@@ -491,7 +861,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> kfree(pe_bitsmap);
>>>>- return master_pe->pe_number;
>>>>+ return master_pe;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void __init pnv_ioda_parse_m64_window(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>>>@@ -695,7 +1065,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_get_pe_state(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no)
>>>> * but in the meantime, we need to protect them to avoid warnings
>>>> */
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>>>>-static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_get_pe(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_pci_dev_to_pe(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
>>>> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>>>@@ -709,191 +1079,6 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_get_pe(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> }
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
>>>>
>>>>-static int pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *parent,
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *child,
>>>>- bool is_add)
>>>>-{
>>>>- const char *desc = is_add ? "adding" : "removing";
>>>>- uint8_t op = is_add ? OPAL_ADD_PE_TO_DOMAIN :
>>>>- OPAL_REMOVE_PE_FROM_DOMAIN;
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *slave;
>>>>- long rc;
>>>>-
>>>>- /* Parent PE affects child PE */
>>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id, parent->pe_number,
>>>>- child->pe_number, op);
>>>>- if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>>>- pe_warn(child, "OPAL error %ld %s to parent PELTV\n",
>>>>- rc, desc);
>>>>- return -ENXIO;
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- if (!(child->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER))
>>>>- return 0;
>>>>-
>>>>- /* Compound case: parent PE affects slave PEs */
>>>>- list_for_each_entry(slave, &child->slaves, list) {
>>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id, parent->pe_number,
>>>>- slave->pe_number, op);
>>>>- if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>>>- pe_warn(slave, "OPAL error %ld %s to parent PELTV\n",
>>>>- rc, desc);
>>>>- return -ENXIO;
>>>>- }
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- return 0;
>>>>-}
>>>>-
>>>>-static int pnv_ioda_set_peltv(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe,
>>>>- bool is_add)
>>>>-{
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *slave;
>>>>- struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>>>>- int ret;
>>>>-
>>>>- /*
>>>>- * Clear PE frozen state. If it's master PE, we need
>>>>- * clear slave PE frozen state as well.
>>>>- */
>>>>- if (is_add) {
>>>>- opal_pci_eeh_freeze_clear(phb->opal_id, pe->pe_number,
>>>>- OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
>>>>- if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER) {
>>>>- list_for_each_entry(slave, &pe->slaves, list)
>>>>- opal_pci_eeh_freeze_clear(phb->opal_id,
>>>>- slave->pe_number,
>>>>- OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
>>>>- }
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- /*
>>>>- * Associate PE in PELT. We need add the PE into the
>>>>- * corresponding PELT-V as well. Otherwise, the error
>>>>- * originated from the PE might contribute to other
>>>>- * PEs.
>>>>- */
>>>>- ret = pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(phb, pe, pe, is_add);
>>>>- if (ret)
>>>>- return ret;
>>>>-
>>>>- /* For compound PEs, any one affects all of them */
>>>>- if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER) {
>>>>- list_for_each_entry(slave, &pe->slaves, list) {
>>>>- ret = pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(phb, slave, pe, is_add);
>>>>- if (ret)
>>>>- return ret;
>>>>- }
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- if (pe->flags & (PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL | PNV_IODA_PE_BUS))
>>>>- pdev = pe->pbus->self;
>>>>- else if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_DEV)
>>>>- pdev = pe->pdev->bus->self;
>>>>-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>>- else if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_VF)
>>>>- pdev = pe->parent_dev->bus->self;
>>>>-#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>>- while (pdev) {
>>>>- struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *parent;
>>>>-
>>>>- if (pdn && pdn->pe_number != IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>>>- parent = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pdn->pe_number];
>>>>- ret = pnv_ioda_set_one_peltv(phb, parent, pe, is_add);
>>>>- if (ret)
>>>>- return ret;
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- pdev = pdev->bus->self;
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- return 0;
>>>>-}
>>>>-
>>>>-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>>-static int pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>>-{
>>>>- struct pci_dev *parent;
>>>>- uint8_t bcomp, dcomp, fcomp;
>>>>- int64_t rc;
>>>>- long rid_end, rid;
>>>>-
>>>>- /* Currently, we just deconfigure VF PE. Bus PE will always there.*/
>>>>- if (pe->pbus) {
>>>>- int count;
>>>>-
>>>>- dcomp = OPAL_IGNORE_RID_DEVICE_NUMBER;
>>>>- fcomp = OPAL_IGNORE_RID_FUNCTION_NUMBER;
>>>>- parent = pe->pbus->self;
>>>>- if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL)
>>>>- count = pe->pbus->busn_res.end - pe->pbus->busn_res.start + 1;
>>>>- else
>>>>- count = 1;
>>>>-
>>>>- switch(count) {
>>>>- case 1: bcomp = OpalPciBusAll; break;
>>>>- case 2: bcomp = OpalPciBus7Bits; break;
>>>>- case 4: bcomp = OpalPciBus6Bits; break;
>>>>- case 8: bcomp = OpalPciBus5Bits; break;
>>>>- case 16: bcomp = OpalPciBus4Bits; break;
>>>>- case 32: bcomp = OpalPciBus3Bits; break;
>>>>- default:
>>>>- dev_err(&pe->pbus->dev, "Number of subordinate buses %d unsupported\n",
>>>>- count);
>>>>- /* Do an exact match only */
>>>>- bcomp = OpalPciBusAll;
>>>>- }
>>>>- rid_end = pe->rid + (count << 8);
>>>>- } else {
>>>>- if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_VF)
>>>>- parent = pe->parent_dev;
>>>>- else
>>>>- parent = pe->pdev->bus->self;
>>>>- bcomp = OpalPciBusAll;
>>>>- dcomp = OPAL_COMPARE_RID_DEVICE_NUMBER;
>>>>- fcomp = OPAL_COMPARE_RID_FUNCTION_NUMBER;
>>>>- rid_end = pe->rid + 1;
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- /* Clear the reverse map */
>>>>- for (rid = pe->rid; rid < rid_end; rid++)
>>>>- phb->ioda.pe_rmap[rid] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>>-
>>>>- /* Release from all parents PELT-V */
>>>>- while (parent) {
>>>>- struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(parent);
>>>>- if (pdn && pdn->pe_number != IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id, pdn->pe_number,
>>>>- pe->pe_number, OPAL_REMOVE_PE_FROM_DOMAIN);
>>>>- /* XXX What to do in case of error ? */
>>>
>>>
>>>Not much :) Free associated memory and mark it "dead" so it won't be used
>>>again till reboot. In what circumstance can this opal_pci_set_peltv() fail at
>>>all?
>>>
>>
>>Yeah, maybe. Until now, I didn't see this failure since the code is there
>>from the day. Note the code has been there for almost 4 years since the
>>day Ben wrote it.
>
>
>Sure. But if it starts failing, we won't even notice it - there is no even
>pr_err() or WARN_ON.
>
Agree. I'll see what I can do. At least I can have error message to alert.
>>
>>>
>>>>- }
>>>>- parent = parent->bus->self;
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>>- opal_pci_eeh_freeze_set(phb->opal_id, pe->pe_number,
>>>>- OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
>>>>-
>>>>- /* Disassociate PE in PELT */
>>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id, pe->pe_number,
>>>>- pe->pe_number, OPAL_REMOVE_PE_FROM_DOMAIN);
>>>>- if (rc)
>>>>- pe_warn(pe, "OPAL error %ld remove self from PELTV\n", rc);
>>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_pe(phb->opal_id, pe->pe_number, pe->rid,
>>>>- bcomp, dcomp, fcomp, OPAL_UNMAP_PE);
>>>>- if (rc)
>>>>- pe_err(pe, "OPAL error %ld trying to setup PELT table\n", rc);
>>>>-
>>>>- pe->pbus = NULL;
>>>>- pe->pdev = NULL;
>>>>- pe->parent_dev = NULL;
>>>>-
>>>>- return 0;
>>>>-}
>>>>-#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>>-
>>>> static int pnv_ioda_configure_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_dev *parent;
>>>>@@ -953,7 +1138,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_configure_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Configure PELTV */
>>>>- pnv_ioda_set_peltv(phb, pe, true);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_set_peltv(pe, true);
>>>>
>>>> /* Setup reverse map */
>>>> for (rid = pe->rid; rid < rid_end; rid++)
>>>>@@ -1207,6 +1392,8 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_same_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>>>> if (pdn->pe_number != IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>>+ /* Increase reference count of the parent PE */
>>>
>>>When you comment like this, I read it as the comment belongs to the whole
>>>next chunk till the first empty line, i.e. to all 5 lines below, which is not
>>>the case. I'd remove the comment as 1) "pe_get" in pnv_ioda_pe_get() name
>>>suggests incrementing the reference counter 2) "pe" is always parent in this
>>>function. I do not insist though.
>>>
>>
>>Agree on your explaining. I'll remove this unuseful comments.
>>
>>>
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_pe_get(pe);
>>>> pdn->pe_number = pe->pe_number;
>>>> pe->dma_weight += pnv_ioda_dev_dma_weight(dev);
>>>> if ((pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL) && dev->subordinate)
>>>>@@ -1224,7 +1411,7 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, int all)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = NULL;
>>>> int pe_num = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>>>
>>>> /* For partial hotplug case, the PE instance hasn't been destroyed
>>>>@@ -1240,24 +1427,24 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, int all)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* PE number for root bus should have been reserved */
>>>>- if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>>>>- pe_num = phb->ioda.root_pe_no;
>>>>+ if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) &&
>>>>+ phb->ioda.root_pe_no != IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>>>+ pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[phb->ioda.root_pe_no];
>>>>
>>>> /* Check if PE is determined by M64 */
>>>>- if (pe_num == IODA_INVALID_PE && phb->pick_m64_pe)
>>>>- pe_num = phb->pick_m64_pe(phb, bus, all);
>>>>+ if (!pe && phb->pick_m64_pe)
>>>>+ pe = phb->pick_m64_pe(phb, bus, all);
>>>>
>>>> /* The PE number isn't pinned by M64 */
>>>>- if (pe_num == IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>>>- pe_num = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
>>>>+ if (!pe)
>>>>+ pe = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
>>>>
>>>>- if (pe_num == IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>>>- pr_warning("%s: Not enough PE# available for PCI bus %04x:%02x\n",
>>>>+ if (!pe) {
>>>>+ pr_warn("%s: No enough PE# available for PCI bus %04x:%02x\n",
>>>> __func__, pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number);
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>- pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_num];
>>>> pe->flags |= (all ? PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL : PNV_IODA_PE_BUS);
>>>> pe->pbus = bus;
>>>> pe->pdev = NULL;
>>>>@@ -1274,14 +1461,12 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, int all)
>>>>
>>>> if (pnv_ioda_configure_pe(phb, pe)) {
>>>> /* XXX What do we do here ? */
>>>>- if (pe_num)
>>>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pe_num);
>>>>- pe->pbus = NULL;
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_pe_put(pe);
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> pe->tce32_table = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct iommu_table),
>>>>- GFP_KERNEL, hose->node);
>>>>+ GFP_KERNEL, hose->node);
>>>
>>>Seems like spaces change only - if you really want this change (which I hate
>>>- makes code look inaccurate to my taste but it seems I am in minority here
>>>:) ), please put it to the separate patch.
>>>
>>
>>Ok. Confirm with you: You prefer the original format? I don't know
>>why I prefer the later one. Maybe my eyes are quite broken :-)
>
>
>I prefer not to change existing whitespaces unless it is done once and for
>the entire file :) Just remove this change from the patch.
>
Sure.
>>>
>>>> pe->tce32_table->data = pe;
>>>>
>>>> /* Associate it with all child devices */
>>>>@@ -1521,9 +1706,9 @@ static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> list_del(&pe->list);
>>>> mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
>>>>
>>>>- pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(phb, pe);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(pe);
>>>
>>>
>>>Is this change necessary to get "Release PEs dynamically" working? Move it to
>>>mechanical changes patch may be?
>>>
>>
>>Ok. I'll try to do that.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pe->pe_number);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_pe_put(pe);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>@@ -1601,9 +1786,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>>
>>>> if (pnv_ioda_configure_pe(phb, pe)) {
>>>> /* XXX What do we do here ? */
>>>>- if (pe_num)
>>>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pe_num);
>>>>- pe->pdev = NULL;
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_pe_put(pe);
>>>> continue;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>@@ -2263,7 +2446,7 @@ int pnv_phb_to_cxl_mode(struct pci_dev *dev, uint64_t mode)
>>>> struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>>> int rc;
>>>>
>>>>- pe = pnv_ioda_get_pe(dev);
>>>>+ pe = pnv_ioda_pci_dev_to_pe(dev);
>>>
>>>
>>>And this change could to separately. Not clear how this helps to "Release PEs
>>>dynamically".
>>>
>>>
>>
>>It's not related to "Release PEs dynamically". The change is introduced by
>>the function rename: Original pnv_ioda_get_pe() is renamed to pnv_ioda_pci_dev_to_pe().
>
>
>But the rename happened in this patch and the patch's subj is "Release PEs
>dynamically" so it should be related somehow or move it to a simple separate
>patch "let's give the lalala function a better name to reflect what it
>actually does" (but in this case the new name does not make any more sense
>than the old one).
>
Yeah, I'll try to split the patches to separate blala and walala :-)
>>>> if (!pe)
>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>
>>>>@@ -2379,7 +2562,7 @@ int pnv_cxl_ioda_msi_setup(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int hwirq,
>>>> struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>>> int rc;
>>>>
>>>>- if (!(pe = pnv_ioda_get_pe(dev)))
>>>>+ if (!(pe = pnv_ioda_pci_dev_to_pe(dev)))
>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>
>>>> /* Assign XIVE to PE */
>>>>@@ -2401,7 +2584,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_ioda_msi_setup(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pci_dev *dev,
>>>> unsigned int hwirq, unsigned int virq,
>>>> unsigned int is_64, struct msi_msg *msg)
>>>> {
>>>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = pnv_ioda_get_pe(dev);
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = pnv_ioda_pci_dev_to_pe(dev);
>>>> unsigned int xive_num = hwirq - phb->msi_base;
>>>> __be32 data;
>>>> int rc;
>>>>@@ -3065,6 +3248,7 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct device_node *np,
>>>> pnv_pci_controller_ops.setup_bridge = pnv_pci_setup_bridge;
>>>> pnv_pci_controller_ops.window_alignment = pnv_pci_window_alignment;
>>>> pnv_pci_controller_ops.reset_secondary_bus = pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus;
>>>>+ pnv_pci_controller_ops.release_device = pnv_pci_release_device;
>>>> hose->controller_ops = pnv_pci_controller_ops;
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>>>index 1bea3a8..8b10f01 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>>>@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ enum pnv_phb_model {
>>>> /* Data associated with a PE, including IOMMU tracking etc.. */
>>>> struct pnv_phb;
>>>> struct pnv_ioda_pe {
>>>>+ struct kref kref;
>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>>>
>>>>@@ -120,7 +121,8 @@ struct pnv_phb {
>>>> void (*shutdown)(struct pnv_phb *phb);
>>>> int (*init_m64)(struct pnv_phb *phb);
>>>> void (*reserve_m64_pe)(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pci_bus *bus);
>>>>- int (*pick_m64_pe)(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pci_bus *bus, int all);
>>>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *(*pick_m64_pe)(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>>>+ struct pci_bus *bus, int all);
>>>> int (*get_pe_state)(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no);
>>>> void (*freeze_pe)(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no);
>>>> int (*unfreeze_pe)(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no, int opt);
>>>>
Thanks,
Gavin
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list