Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3

Arnd Bergmann arnd at arndb.de
Tue Mar 10 01:10:49 AEDT 2015


On Monday 09 March 2015 11:56:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > JFYI, when comparing v4.0-rc3[1] to v4.0-rc2[3], the summaries are:
> >   - build errors: +18/-7
> 
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
> 'SMC91X_NOWAIT' undeclared here (not in a function):  => 85:47
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
> 'SMC91X_USE_32BIT' undeclared here (not in a function):  => 85:11
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error:
> 'SMC91X_USE_DMA' undeclared here (not in a function):  => 85:30
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: unknown
> field 'flags' specified in initializer:  => 85:2
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/idp.c: error: variable
> 'smc91x_platdata' has initializer but incomplete type:  => 84:15
> 
> pxa255-idp_defconfig
> 
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c: error: expected
> '}' before ';' token:  => 198:43
> 
> lpd270_defconfig
> 
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c: error:
> 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared (first use in this function):  => 271:12
> 
> neponset_defconfig
> 
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pleb.c: error:
> 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared here (not in a function):  => 57:22
> 
> pleb_defconfig
> 
>   + /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: error:
> implicit declaration of function 'machine_has_neponset'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]:  => 2363:2
> 
> neponset_defconfig
> 
> smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by
> "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet?

It's not?

This should be part of that patch:

--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = {
 };
 
 struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = {
-       .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT;
+       .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT,
 };
 
 static struct platform_device smc91x_device = {

and I thought I had tested all defconfigs as well as hundreds of randconfigs
(the right ones) successfully this time.


	Arnd


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list