[PATCH SLOF 4/5] disk-label: add support for booting from GPT FAT partition
Nikunj A Dadhania
nikunj at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Jun 24 15:33:34 AEST 2015
Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:29:46 +0530
> Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> For a GPT+LVM combination disk, older bootloader that does not support
>> LVM, cannot load kernel from LVM.
>>
>> The patch add support to read from BASIC_DATA UUID
>> partition. Installer has installed CHRP-BOOT config on a FAT file
>> system.
>
> Maybe better: The patch adds support to read from BASIC_DATA UUID
> partitions for the case that the OS installer has installed
> the CHRP-BOOT config on a FAT file system.
>
> ?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs b/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs
>> index e317e93..821e959 100644
>> --- a/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs
>> +++ b/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs
>> @@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ CONSTANT /gpt-part-entry
>>
>> : try-dos-partition ( -- okay? )
>> \ Read partition table and check magic.
>> - no-mbr? IF cr ." No DOS disk-label found." cr false EXIT THEN
>> + no-mbr? IF
>> + debug-disk-label? IF cr ." No DOS disk-label found." cr THEN
>> + false EXIT
>> + THEN
>>
>> count-dos-logical-partitions TO dos-logical-partitions
>>
>> @@ -381,18 +384,38 @@ AA268B49521E5A8B CONSTANT GPT-PREP-PARTITION-4
>> TRUE
>> ;
>>
>> -: load-from-gpt-prep-partition ( addr -- size )
>> +\ Check for GPT MSFT BASIC DATA GUID - fat based
>> +EBD0A0A2 CONSTANT GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-1
>> +B9E5 CONSTANT GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-2
>> +4433 CONSTANT GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-3
>> +87C068B6B72699C7 CONSTANT GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-4
>> +
>> +: gpt-basic-data-partition? ( -- true|false )
>> + block gpt-part-entry>part-type-guid
>> + dup l at -le GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-1 <> IF DROP FALSE EXIT THEN
>> + dup 4 + w at -le GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-2 <> IF DROP FALSE EXIT THEN
>> + dup 6 + w at -le GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-3 <> IF DROP FALSE EXIT THEN
>> + 8 + x@ GPT-BASIC-DATA-PARTITION-4 <> IF FALSE EXIT THEN
>> + TRUE
>> +;
>> +
>> +\ Can be called from two path
>> +\ 1) load-from-boot-partition for GPT PReP partition
>> +\ 2) try-partitions for gpt basic data partition having fat chrp-boot
>
> What did you want to achieve with the above comment? Caller locations
> can change with later patches, but it's unlikely that everybody
> remembers to update such comments in that case. So unlikely you've got
> a good reason for above comment (but in that case, it maybe should be
> written in a different way), I'd suggest to drop it.
I will redo this word and split it so that do not have confusing
signature.
>
>> +: load-from-gpt-partition ( [ addr ] -- size | TRUE )
>
> What do you mean with addr in square brackets? Is it optional?
>
>> no-gpt? IF drop FALSE EXIT THEN
>> debug-disk-label? IF
>> cr ." GPT partition found " cr
>> THEN
>> - 1 read-sector block gpt>part-entry-lba l at -le
>> + 1 read-sector block gpt>part-entry-lba x at -le
>> block-size * to seek-pos
>> block gpt>part-entry-size l at -le to gpt-part-size
>> block gpt>num-part-entry l at -le dup 0= IF FALSE EXIT THEN
>> 1+ 1 ?DO
>> seek-pos 0 seek drop
>> - block gpt-part-size read drop gpt-prep-partition? IF
>> + block gpt-part-size read drop
>> + gpt-prep-partition? IF
>
> You've changed the level of indentation here. Please try to avoid that
> (unless you've got a good reason, e.g. because the previous indentation
> was obviously wrong)
Not intentional, I try to make sure I do not change the indentation.
>
>> debug-disk-label? IF
>> ." GPT PReP partition found " cr
>> THEN
>> @@ -404,6 +427,24 @@ AA268B49521E5A8B CONSTANT GPT-PREP-PARTITION-4
>> 0 0 seek drop ( addr len )
>> block-size * read ( size )
>> UNLOOP EXIT
>> + THEN
>> + gpt-basic-data-partition? IF
>
> Hmm, I wonder whether we need a proper coding conventions spec for
> writing Forth code ... (at least about the indentation depths ...) ;-)
>
>> + debug-disk-label? IF
>> + ." GPT LINUX DATA partition found " cr
>> + THEN
>> + block gpt-part-entry>first-lba x@ xbflip
>> + dup to part-start
>> + block gpt-part-entry>last-lba x@ xbflip
>> + over - 1+ ( addr offset len )
>> + dup block-size * to part-size
>> + swap ( addr len offset )
>> + block-size * to part-offset
>> + 0 0 seek
>> + block block-size read
>> + 3drop
>> + block has-fat-filesystem 0= IF false UNLOOP EXIT THEN
>> + TRUE
>> + UNLOOP EXIT
>> THEN
>> seek-pos gpt-part-size i * + to seek-pos
>> LOOP
>> @@ -495,11 +536,11 @@ AA268B49521E5A8B CONSTANT GPT-PREP-PARTITION-4
>>
>> debug-disk-label? IF ." Trying CHRP boot " .s cr THEN
>> 1 disk-chrp-boot !
>> - dup load-chrp-boot-file ?dup 0 <> IF .s cr nip EXIT THEN
>> + dup load-chrp-boot-file ?dup 0 <> IF nip EXIT THEN
>> 0 disk-chrp-boot !
>>
>> debug-disk-label? IF ." Trying GPT boot " .s cr THEN
>> - load-from-gpt-prep-partition
>> + load-from-gpt-partition
>
> So here the function is called with an "addr" parameter on the stack ...
>
>> \ More boot partition formats ...
>> ;
>>
>> @@ -594,6 +635,7 @@ AA268B49521E5A8B CONSTANT GPT-PREP-PARTITION-4
>>
>> : try-partitions ( -- found? )
>> try-dos-partition IF try-files EXIT THEN
>> + load-from-gpt-partition IF try-files EXIT THEN
>
> ... but here it is called without an "addr" parameter? *Confusing*
> How does this work?
Yes :-)
Let me rework on this to break it up for readabilty and better stack
debugging.
Regards
Nikunj
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list